{"id":35068,"date":"2013-04-07T10:52:36","date_gmt":"2013-04-07T14:52:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=35068"},"modified":"2013-04-07T11:12:34","modified_gmt":"2013-04-07T15:12:34","slug":"old-themes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/04\/07\/old-themes\/","title":{"rendered":"old themes&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div align=\"justify\">In my mind, I call openings like this the <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Sally Laden Memorial Global Burden of Depression Opening Paragraphs<\/font><\/strong> after the most famous of our ghost writers:                     <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.dana.org\/news\/cerebrum\/detail.aspx?id=41290\">Psychiatric Drug Development: Diagnosing a Crisis<\/a><br \/>                                   <strong><font color=\"#200020\">The Dana Foundation: Cerebrum<\/font><\/strong><br \/>                                  By Steven E. Hyman<br \/>                                   April 02, 2013<br \/>              <sup><strong>[full text available on-line]<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong>                        <\/p>\n<p>During the past three years the global pharmaceutical industry has significantly decreased its investment in new treatments for depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and other psychiatric disorders.1 Some large companies, such as GlaxoSmithKline, have closed their psychiatric laboratories entirely. Others, such as Pfizer, have markedly decreased the size of their research programs. Yet others, such as AstraZeneca, have brought their internal research to a close and are experimenting with external collaborations on a smaller scale. <\/p>\n<div>This retreat has occurred despite the fact that mental disorders are not only common worldwide, but also increasingly recognized by healthcare systems. There is, moreover, vast unmet medical need, meaning that many individuals with mental disorders remain symptomatic and often disabled despite existing treatments. For example, people suffering with the depressed phase of bipolar disorder often continue to experience severe symptoms even when they take multiple medications with serious side effects. For some significantly disabling conditions, such as the core social deficits of autism and the cognitive impairments of schizophrenia, there simply are no effective treatments. Because mental disorders are highly prevalent and our ability to treat them remains limited, these illnesses cause enormous societal burden. <font color=\"#990000\">In aggregate, they are the world&rsquo;s leading cause of disability<\/font>.&sup2;&#8230;<\/div>\n<p><\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">In this one, Dr. Hyman is pretending to be mystified that drug companies have withdrawn from developing CNS drugs since there&#8217;s such a need [and such a market]. Similar paragraphs often begin ghosted articles about industry-funded anti-depressant trials. They are faux-justifications for something or another the author is trying to push. They frequently cite the 2004 WHO report on the <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Global Burden of Disease<\/font><\/strong>, documenting the public health toll from Depression. Here&#8217;s one of the tables from that report:                     <\/div>\n<p align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/wp-admin\/www.who.int\/healthinfo\/global_burden_disease\/GBD_report_2004update_full.pdf#page=54\" target=\"_blank\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" width=\"431\" height=\"443\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/gbd.gif\" \/><\/a><br \/>                         <sup><strong>[click image to view report]<\/strong><\/sup><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">In this case, it&#8217;s a particularly forced logic as it&#8217;s inconceivable that the pharmaceutical companies don&#8217;t know that there&#8217;s a mega-market for anti-depressants. They&#8217;ve been mining it for the last quarter century. Here&#8217;s one of the many studies that questions the accuracy of surveys like this one from the WHO:              <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pmc\/articles\/PMC3014564\/\" target=\"_blank\">Global Burden of Disease estimates of depression &ndash; how reliable is the epidemiological evidence?<\/a><br \/>                 <sup><strong>by Petra Brhlikova, Allyson M Pollock, and Rachel Manners<\/strong><\/sup><br \/>                 <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine<\/font><\/strong>. 2011 104(1): 25&ndash;34.<br \/>              <sup><strong>[full text available on-line]<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<p>                 <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong>&#8230; Of the 40 countries with data, 22 countries did not have nationally representative data and the national representativeness of the included studies could not be determined for a further six countries. In EURO, the region with the highest coverage, only six of 15 studies had a nationally representative sample. The three AFRO studies were based on a small village or town. Likewise South-East Asia region had data on only four countries but none of the samples were nationally representative. Of the 6016 respondents: 5145 were in one Indian state (Andhra Pradesh); 612 from three constituencies in Singapore; 259 from a semi-urban village in Pakistan and Nepal could not be ascertained (Table 2). Overall, only 12 of the 36 (33%) studies for which we have data used a nationally representative sample.<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<p align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" width=\"396\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/gbd-1.gif\" \/><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong>&#8230; GBDep estimates have limited value in international policy-making. GBDep estimates are epidemiologically flawed in terms of representativeness and quality. Recent research initiatives focus on improving data collection and methods for the 2010 update of GBD estimates but there is a need to put in place disease surveillance and vital registration systems in advance of such studies.34 This review provides a template for evaluating the quality of the studies used in 2010 estimates. Moreover, for neuropsychiatric disorders such as depression where the pathophysiologic process cannot be directly observed but must be inferred, there is a need to be sensitive to the numerous interpretative difficulties in determining rates of disease and better understanding of depression in the context of cultural, sociological and economic conditions. <font color=\"#990000\">Single composite measures of depression are highly problematic: they conceal and hide uncertainty, compromise biases and distortions in epidemiological data. Crucially single measures of disease burden distance mental well-being from the social determinants of health such as poverty and economic status and fail to recognize their cultural and social significance let alone their interaction with other disease states.<\/font><\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">I would hardly be in a position to thoroughly vet a World Health Organization [WHO] report using only the information that filters its way down to rural Georgia, but I still feel pretty comfortable saying that these widely used <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Sally Laden Memorial Global Burden of Depression Opening Paragraphs<\/font><\/strong> hardly call on robust evidence for the conclusions they reach &#8211; that waves of Depression are sweeping the world justifying emergency measures. I&#8217;d say they&#8217;re examples of the <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Karl Rove Memorial Media Flooding Technique<\/font><\/strong> &#8211; named for the technology that we were bombarded with during the Bush years in the US [if enough people say it enough times in enough places, people will believe it]. More to the point, here are a couple of much more rational versions of why the pharmaceutical industry is pulling out of CNS drug development:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/schizophreniabulletin.oxfordjournals.org\/content\/38\/4\/649.full\"><u><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Psychiatry, The Pharmaceutical Industry, and The Road to Better Therapeutics<\/font><\/strong><\/u><\/a><br \/>                                            <sup>by H. Christian Fibiger<\/sup><br \/>                                            <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Schizophrenia Bulletin<\/font><\/strong>. 2012 38(4):649&ndash;650.<br \/>              <sup><strong>[full text available on-line]<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><sup>&hellip; The discovery of all three major classes of psychiatric drugs,  antidepressants, antipsychotics, and anxiolytics, came about                   on the basis of <font color=\"#990000\">serendipitous clinical observation<\/font>. At  the time of their discoveries, the mechanisms by which these molecules                   produce their effects were unknown, and it was only  later that antipsychotics were shown to be D2 receptor antagonists,  antidepressants                   monoamine reuptake inhibitors, and anxiolytics GABA  receptor modulators. It is interesting and perhaps instructive to  consider                   whether any of these classes of drugs could have been  discovered by current drug discovery strategies&hellip;<\/sup><\/strong><\/div>\n<p>             <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><sup>What the                   field lacks is sufficient basic knowledge about normal  brain function and how its disturbance underlies the pathophysiology                   of psychiatric  disease. Because of this, as the  record now clearly shows, it remains too early to attempt rational drug  design                   for psychiatric diseases as currently conceived. The  most obvious solution here is expanded investment in neuroscience. By                   necessity, this will be driven primarily by the  efforts of clinical and basic scientists in academic settings because  industry                   no longer has the appetite or the resources to engage  in such activities. <font color=\"#990000\">It is worth emphasizing that industry is in the                   business of making drugs, knowledge sometimes being a  fortuitous byproduct. Academia is in the business of generating  knowledge,                   and knowledge is what is needed at present&hellip;<\/font><\/sup><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><a href=\"http:\/\/hcrenewal.blogspot.com\/2013\/04\/walk-walk-for-some-time-jeremiad-theme.html\" target=\"_blank\">Walk the Walk<\/a><br \/>               <strong><font color=\"#0066ff\">Healthcare Renewal<\/font><\/strong><br \/>               by Bernard Carroll<br \/>               April 6, 2013<br \/>              <sup><strong>[full text available on-line]<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<p>           <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong>Lost  in the wailing is a clear understanding that the defecting corporations  are acting out of their own enlightened self interest. For  50 years,  no fundamentally incisive innovations have occurred, so the  defectors  are telling the academics to get their act together in respect of better  understanding disease mechanisms. <font color=\"#990000\">Trouble is, too many academic  clinical  investigators have devolved into key opinion leaders promoting   corporate marketing messages at the expense of generating original  clinical science. Now they are  squawking about being caught with their  pants down&#8230;<\/font><\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">And, they couldn&#8217;t bring it off again with an SSRI\/SNRI drug anyway. It would be like another renamed Aspirin + Acetaminophen + Caffiene headache pill &#8211; already been done enough times. Hyman admits to that up front:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><strong>However, payers [both  insurance companies and governments] and regulatory agencies have given  up their willingness to accept even more expensive new drugs that,  despite marketing efforts, have turned out to be no more than variations  on very old themes.<\/strong><\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">So along the path of very old themes, we have:<\/div>\n<ul><sup><strong>     <\/p>\n<li>chemical imbalance<\/li>\n<li>global burden of depression<\/li>\n<li>SSRI versus SNRI<\/li>\n<li>sequencing [STAR*D]<\/li>\n<li>combining [CO-MED]<\/li>\n<li>augmenting<\/li>\n<p>  <\/strong><\/sup><\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">Soon to be joined by:<\/div>\n<ul><sup><strong>     <\/p>\n<li>personalized medicine [i-SPOT][EMBARC]<\/li>\n<li>neural circuit abnormalities <\/li>\n<p>  <\/strong><\/sup><\/ul>\n<div>Dr. Hyman and friends just don&#8217;t know the end of an era when they see one&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In my mind, I call openings like this the Sally Laden Memorial Global Burden of Depression Opening Paragraphs after the most famous of our ghost writers: Psychiatric Drug Development: Diagnosing a Crisis The Dana Foundation: Cerebrum By Steven E. Hyman April 02, 2013 [full text available on-line] During the past three years the global pharmaceutical [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35068","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35068","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35068"}],"version-history":[{"count":55,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35068\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":35123,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35068\/revisions\/35123"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35068"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35068"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35068"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}