{"id":3680,"date":"2009-11-23T13:26:02","date_gmt":"2009-11-23T17:26:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=3680"},"modified":"2009-11-23T14:06:09","modified_gmt":"2009-11-23T18:06:09","slug":"failed-as-utterly-and-completely-as-soviet-communism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2009\/11\/23\/failed-as-utterly-and-completely-as-soviet-communism\/","title":{"rendered":"<em>failed as utterly and completely as Soviet Communism<\/em>&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\"><em><sup><u>master-slave dialectic<\/u>: the encounter between two self-conscious beings, who engage in a &quot;struggle to the death&quot; before one enslaves the other, only to find that this does not give him the control over the world he had sought&#8230;<\/sup><\/em><\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/feedproxy.google.com\/%7Er\/OpenLeft-FrontPage\/%7E3\/Ha4loqmpfiY\/obama-in-china-highlights-total-failure-of-conservative-visionif-you-know-how-to-see\">Obama in China highlights total failure of conservative vision<br \/>                 &#8211; if you know how to see<\/a><br \/>                 <font color=\"#990000\">Open Left<\/font><\/strong><br \/>                 By Paul Rosenberg<br \/>                 November 22, 2009<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Bush&#8217;s tax cuts &amp; &quot;free market\/free trade&quot; policies were supposed to turbo-charge America&#8217;s economy, while the neo-conservative foreign policy laid out by the <strong>Project for a New American Century<\/strong> in <strong>&quot;<\/strong><a target=\"new\" href=\"http:\/\/www.newamericancentury.org\/RebuildingAmericasDefenses.pdf\"><strong>Rebuilding America&#8217;s Defenses<\/strong><\/a><strong>&quot;<\/strong> was supposed to be a blueprint for extending American hegemony across the globe, indefinitely, with the containment and subordination of China as a key strategic goal. Conveniently, those lofty promises of yesteryear have been entirely forgotten. &nbsp;Otherwise it would have been impossible to cover Obama&#8217;s recent visit to China without starkly confronting the utter failure of conservative ideology, given its first unfettered shot at power since the 1920s, when it brought us the Great Depression&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In summary, the neo-cons never even saw the terrorist coming. &nbsp;They were taken completely by surprise, and now insist the Obama must continue on the doomed path of failure that they have constructed&#8230;not even <em>thinking<\/em> about the number one challenge that <em>they themselves<\/em> were obsessed with before getting blind-sided by <em>al Qaeda<\/em>. Is there any way to even <em>begin<\/em> to grasp how utterly foolish this state of affairs is? There are people in lunatic asylums who deserve to be taken more seriously than this sorry crowd of losers.<strong><font color=\"#200020\"> It&#8217;s just that simple. Conservatism as an ideology has failed as utterly and completely as Soviet Communism. &nbsp;It&#8217;s time to toss it onto the dust heap of history, before America itself winds up there.<\/font><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p align=\"justify\">This is actually an article about China, but I loved the opening and closing so much that I left out the middle altogether. With Glen Beck organizing a march to the Lincoln Memorial on MLK day and Sarah Palin speeding about on her bus tour, I needed a shot of rational thinking.<\/p>\n<table width=\"90%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"4\" border=\"0\" align=\"center\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong>con&middot;ser&middot;va&middot;tism<\/strong>&nbsp;\\k\u00c9\u2122n-\u00cb\u02c6s\u00c9\u2122r-v\u00c9\u2122-\u00cb\u0152ti-z\u00c9\u2122m\\<\/div>\n<div><em>noun<\/em> <\/div>\n<div>1832<\/div>\n<ol>\n<li><em>Conservatism<\/em>\n<ul>\n<li>the principles and policies of a Conservative party<\/li>\n<li>the Conservative party<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li><em>conservatism<\/em>\n<ul>\n<li>disposition in politics to preserve what is established<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\">a political philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change; <em>specifically<\/em>  <strong>:<\/strong> such a philosophy calling for lower taxes, limited government regulation of business and investing, a strong national defense, and individual financial responsibility for personal needs [as retirement income or health-care coverage]<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\">the tendency to prefer an existing or traditional situation to change<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p align=\"justify\">I don&#8217;t understand what <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Conservatism<\/font><\/strong> really means. Maybe I never did. One thing I do know is that Conservative people have some shared understanding <strong><font color=\"#200020\"><em>because, on meeting, they seem to recognize each other immediately<\/em><\/font><\/strong>. I&#8217;m not sure that&#8217;s true on the other side of the fence. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">There&#8217;s <em><strong><font color=\"#200020\">another thing that characterizes Conservatives &#8211; negation<\/font><\/strong><\/em>. It&#8217;s apparent in that definition quoted above: <strong><font color=\"#200020\"><u>no<\/u> taxes<\/font><\/strong>, <strong><font color=\"#200020\"><u>no<\/u> regulation<\/font><\/strong>, <strong><font color=\"#200020\"><u>no<\/u> social welfare<\/font><\/strong>. The part about the military is one of the few positives and bears further scrutiny.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"100\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"1\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/thumb\/3\/35\/Tiziano_-_S%C3%ADsifo.jpg\/230px-Tiziano_-_S%C3%ADsifo.jpg\" \/>The piece of Conservatism that has my attention right now is in Paul&#8217;s comments: &quot;<strong><font color=\"#200020\">Conservatism as an ideology has failed as utterly and completely as Soviet Communism.<\/font><\/strong>&quot; That&#8217;s obviously true, but that doesn&#8217;t seem to bother them at all. If anything, it seems to have inspired them. A corollary to these last two points is that <em><strong><font color=\"#200020\">they seem to do best when they&#8217;re out of power<\/font><\/strong><\/em>. The twenty years of Reagan, Bush I, and Bush II have been disastrous failures by any criteria, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to upset any of them [come to think of it, that Nixon fellow wasn&#8217;t so hot either].        <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">There&#8217;s something about morality in all of this that&#8217;s very confusing to me. While they generally loudly taut moralities of various kinds [the abortion, stem cell, homosexuality thing], they don&#8217;t practice it very well [Watergate, Iran\/Contra, Dirty Tricks, Abramoff, CIA Leak, prewar intelligence, ignoring FISA, etc]. I&#8217;m not so sure what you call that, but it looks like <strong><em><font color=\"#200020\">self-righteousness<\/font><\/em><\/strong> [&quot;if you do it, it&#8217;s horrid, but if I do it, it&#8217;s expedient&quot;].<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"100\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"1\" align=\"left\" src=\"http:\/\/4.bp.blogspot.com\/_XJDL7Jxu7hk\/RYgpdv8PJrI\/AAAAAAAAABM\/a5-5pcyIHTQ\/s400\/Battle+of+Liegnitz++1241.jpg\" \/>I&#8217;ve been thinking about how the military business fits in there. On the face of it, it makes little sense. They preach fiscal conservatism and oppose taxation and spending, yet they seem to go for any military program or junket that comes along. I think it must be about <strong><em><font color=\"#200020\">power<\/font><\/em><\/strong>. In politics, in foreign policy &#8211; <strong><em><font color=\"#200020\">power <\/font><\/em><\/strong>is the point. Once they get it, they don&#8217;t seem to know what to do with it.<\/p>\n<table width=\"90%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"4\" border=\"0\" align=\"center\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong>con&middot;ser&middot;va&middot;tism<\/strong>&nbsp;\\k\u00c9\u2122n-\u00cb\u02c6s\u00c9\u2122r-v\u00c9\u2122-\u00cb\u0152ti-z\u00c9\u2122m\\<\/div>\n<div><em>noun<\/em> <\/div>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\">an approach to government based on the principles of Charles Darwin [survival of the fittest] and the&nbsp; ancient Monarchs [rule of the powerful] that thrives as an ideal but flounders as a reality.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\">a way of thinking that insists on personal rightness that transcends opposing logic or actual results.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\">an anachronistic stage in development before the futility of Hegel&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Master-slave_dialectic\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><u><font color=\"#200020\">Master\/Slave Dialectic<\/font><\/u><\/strong><\/a> has been understood.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\">immaturity.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div>[see also <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/The_Myth_of_Sisyphus\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">The Myth of Sisyphus<\/font><\/strong><\/a>]<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>master-slave dialectic: the encounter between two self-conscious beings, who engage in a &quot;struggle to the death&quot; before one enslaves the other, only to find that this does not give him the control over the world he had sought&#8230; Obama in China highlights total failure of conservative vision &#8211; if you know how to see Open [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3680"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3680\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}