{"id":3976,"date":"2010-03-31T10:09:52","date_gmt":"2010-03-31T14:09:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=3976"},"modified":"2010-03-31T10:18:26","modified_gmt":"2010-03-31T14:18:26","slug":"no-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/03\/31\/no-4\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8220;no&#8221;&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.politico.com\/news\/stories\/0310\/35096.html\">RNC rejects joint &#8216;civility&#8217; statement<\/a><br \/>     <font color=\"#990000\">POLITICO<\/font><\/strong><br \/>     By ANDY BARR<br \/>     3\/26\/10<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">The Republican National Committee has rejected a proposal from its  Democratic counterpart to sign a joint &ldquo;civility&rdquo; statement, POLITICO  has learned&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Republicans see the statement as an attempt to force them to either  reject the statement&nbsp;&mdash; allowing Democrats to say the RNC finds the  incidents acceptable&nbsp;&mdash; or to sign on to something that the DNC would  later wield against them. The proposed statement was faxed and hand-delivered to the RNC at  midmorning Friday. <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">POLITICO learned Friday afternoon that the RNC would  not sign the DNC statement. RNC Communications Director Doug Heye told POLITICO that Steele chose  not to agree to the statement because &ldquo;<em>we don&rsquo;t need to do anything on  their schedule or on their timetable<\/em>.&rdquo; <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"> &ldquo;<em>Obviously, a large majority of Americans&nbsp;&mdash; a broad coalition of  Republicans, Democrats and independents &mdash; are upset that President  Obama, Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid pushed through health  care legislation that increases premiums and raises taxes and did so  through strong-arm tactics, closed-door meetings and sweetheart deals.  Voters have a right to be angry. Unfortunately, some have chosen to  engage in language and actions that go too far<\/em>,&rdquo; Heye said, insisting  that &ldquo;<em>among the first voices to condemn such activities was Michael  Steele&rsquo;s<\/em>&rdquo;&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">I&#8217;m not interested in following the thread of this article &#8211; something like &ldquo;<em>Bad, Bad, Republicans. Shame on you.<\/em>&rdquo; Any fool can read that in the title. <\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">I&#8217;m mildly interested in &ldquo;<em>Republicans see the statement as an attempt to force them to either   reject the statement&nbsp;&mdash; allowing Democrats to say the RNC finds the   incidents acceptable&nbsp;&mdash; or to sign on to something that the DNC would   later wield against them<\/em>.&rdquo; Is that what the Democrats were doing? Some cheap ploy to put the Republicans in a double bind? I certainly hope not.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">And as for this, &ldquo;<em>Obviously, a large majority of Americans&nbsp;&mdash; a broad coalition of   Republicans, Democrats and independents &mdash; are upset that President   Obama, Speaker Pelosi and Majority Leader Reid pushed through health   care legislation that increases premiums and raises taxes and did so   through strong-arm tactics, closed-door meetings and sweetheart deals.   Voters have a right to be angry.<\/em>&rdquo; What a cheap shot! But that&#8217;s not interesting, it&#8217;s expected.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">This, however, is interesting: <strong><font color=\"#200020\">&ldquo;<em>we don&rsquo;t need to do anything on  their schedule or on their  timetable<\/em>.&rdquo;<\/font><\/strong> That&#8217;s the kind of response one hears at a predictable period in human development &#8211; age two years old. What parent doesn&#8217;t recall it? The formerly cute little toddler suddenly becomes a human opposition machine that can only say,&nbsp; <em>&ldquo;No!<\/em>&rdquo; Developmental theorists see it as the first step on the road to self definition. It means something like, <em>&ldquo;I don&#8217;t know who or what I am yet, but I do know this &#8211; I&#8217;m not what you think I am or what you want me to be.&rdquo;<\/em> So the little two year old lets the universe know what he\/she is not, to clear a space to learn to <em>&ldquo;be<\/em>&rdquo; in. Some kids get stuck in there for a long time [or forever].<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">I expect that&#8217;s a fair way to look at the Republican Party right now. The Bush Administration left them with no usable identity, no self definition &#8211; corruption, ineptness, scandal, failure, fiscal ruin &#8211; nothing much to rebuild with. So, they&#8217;re having to start over, and they&#8217;re doing it in an infinitely predictable way. Opposition. I expect that&#8217;s why they got so mad at David Frum for telling the truth. He knows who he is &#8211; a Conservative. The Republicans, on the other hand, aren&#8217;t that [Conservative], but they haven&#8217;t figured out the alternative. All the Republicans really have is Rove&#8217;s fear-machine&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>RNC rejects joint &#8216;civility&#8217; statement POLITICO By ANDY BARR 3\/26\/10 The Republican National Committee has rejected a proposal from its Democratic counterpart to sign a joint &ldquo;civility&rdquo; statement, POLITICO has learned&#8230; Republicans see the statement as an attempt to force them to either reject the statement&nbsp;&mdash; allowing Democrats to say the RNC finds the incidents [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3976","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3976","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3976"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3976\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3976"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3976"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3976"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}