{"id":40337,"date":"2013-09-27T12:10:14","date_gmt":"2013-09-27T16:10:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=40337"},"modified":"2013-09-27T12:27:31","modified_gmt":"2013-09-27T16:27:31","slug":"the-devils-still-in-the-details","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/09\/27\/the-devils-still-in-the-details\/","title":{"rendered":"the devil’s still<\/em> in the details…"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
Following up on the last post, this is what the AllTrials campaign proposes [the document contains an Appendix with an outline of the specifics]: <\/div>\n
\n
All trials registered. All results reported.<\/a><\/div>\n
September 2013<\/div>\n

The AllTrials campaign calls for all past and present clinical trials to be registered and their results reported. Clinical trials are investigations designed to assess the effects – wanted and unwanted – of healthcare interventions in people. The Declaration of Helsinki, which is the World Medical Association’s statement of principles for medical research involving people, states that every investigator running a clinical trial should register it and report its results. Millions of volunteers have participated in clinical trials to help find out more about the effects of treatments on disease, yet that important ethical principle about reporting has been widely ignored. Information on what was done and what was found in these trials could be lost forever to doctors and researchers, leading to bad treatment decisions, missed opportunities for good medicine, and trials being repeated. This is what led to the AllTrials campaign in January 2013, a campaign which is now supported by thousands of individual patients, clinicians and researchers across the world, and by hundreds of organisations representing millions of people. <\/p>\n

This document sets out more information about achieving a situation globally where all trials are registered and results reported. It is an achievement that will involve regulators and registries, clinical trial funders, universities and institutes, professional and learned societies and medical journals, patients and researchers. <\/p>\n

This document is part of a continuing discussion which many different organisations are working on elaborating further over coming weeks and months.
Please email views and contributions to: alltrials@senseaboutscience.org <\/p>\n

What trial information needs to be registered and reported?<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n
There are four levels of information in clinical trial reporting:<\/div>\n
    \n
  1. \n
    knowledge that a trial has been conducted, from a clinical trials register;<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  2. \n
    a brief summary of the trial’s results;<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  3. \n
    full details about the trial’s methods and results;<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
  4. \n
    individual patient data from the trial.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n
    The AllTrials campaign is concerned with the first three. There are now initiatives in many countries to work out how individual patient data can be shared with other researchers.<\/div>\n
      \n
    1. \n
      Registration<\/font><\/strong>: <\/div>\n
      Planned clinical trials should be registered, with a summary of the trial protocol, before the first participant is recruited. Past trials that were not registered should now be registered retrospectively. This is essential if the trial was on medicines or interventions that we currently use [this includes some trials conducted before registries were established].<\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/li>\n
    2. \n
      Summary results reporting<\/font><\/strong>: <\/div>\n
      A summary of results should be publicly available where the trial was registered , within o ne year of completion of the trial. Summary results from all past trials of medicines currently in use should be made publicly available on a register now. Summary results include information on the primary and any secondary outcomes measured and statistical analysis. This is part of the structured information that global registries should support. <\/p>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/li>\n
    3. \n
      A full report<\/font><\/strong>: <\/div>\n
      Trial sponsors or others who produce a full report for marketing authorisation or any other purpose should make this publicly available. The narrative reports of adverse events and individual patient data in a full report can be redacted and available on request to researchers, in the same way that reports of adverse incidents currently are, with a commitment that no reasonable request will be refused.<\/font><\/strong> <\/div>\n
      <\/div>\n<\/li>\n
    4. \n
      Individual patient data<\/font><\/strong>: <\/div>\n
      The AllTrials campaign is not calling for individual patient data to be made publicly available. <\/div>\n