{"id":4120,"date":"2010-05-25T00:33:27","date_gmt":"2010-05-25T04:33:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=4120"},"modified":"2010-05-25T00:35:09","modified_gmt":"2010-05-25T04:35:09","slug":"4120","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/05\/25\/4120\/","title":{"rendered":"marching as to war&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Some movies are so good that I compliment them by saying &quot;it&#8217;s not a movie &#8211; it&#8217;s a documentary.&quot; <em>Dances with Wolves<\/em>, <em>The Last Indian<\/em>, <em>Pulp Fiction<\/em>, <em>Field of Dreams, Morgan<\/em>, <em>A Thousand Clowns<\/em>, <em>Captain Blood<\/em>. You know, the really great ones. This op-ed by Krugman is like that. It&#8217;s not an opinion. It&#8217;s just &quot;what is:&quot;<\/font><\/strong><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/05\/24\/opinion\/24krugman.html\">The Old Enemies<\/a><br \/> The New York Times<\/strong><br \/> By PAUL KRUGMAN<br \/> May 23, 2010<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">So here&rsquo;s how it is: They&rsquo;re as mad as hell, and they&rsquo;re not going to  take this anymore. Am I talking about the Tea Partiers? No, I&rsquo;m talking  about the corporations. Much reporting on opposition to the Obama administration portrays it as a  sort of populist uprising. Yet the antics of the  socialism-and-death-panels crowd are only part of the story of  anti-Obamaism, and arguably the less important part. If you really want  to know what&rsquo;s going on, watch the corporations. How can you do that? Follow the money  &mdash;  donations by corporate  political action committees.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Look, for example, at the campaign contributions of commercial banks  &mdash;   traditionally Republican-leaning, but only mildly so. So far this year,  according to The Washington  Post, 63 percent of spending by banks&rsquo; corporate PACs has gone to  Republicans, up from 53 percent last year. Securities and investment  firms, traditionally Democratic-leaning, are now giving more money to  Republicans. And oil and gas companies, always Republican-leaning, have  gone all out, bestowing 76 percent of their largess on the G.O.P. These are extraordinary numbers given the normal tendency of corporate  money to flow to the party in power. Corporate America, however, really,  truly hates the current administration&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> One answer is taxes  &mdash;  not so much on corporations themselves as on the  people who run them. The Obama administration plans to raise tax rates  on upper brackets back to Clinton-era levels. Furthermore, health reform  will in part be paid for with surtaxes on high-income individuals&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> Nor are taxes the whole story. Many Obama supporters have been disappointed by what they see as the  administration&rsquo;s mildness on regulatory issues  &mdash;  its embrace of  limited financial reform that doesn&rsquo;t break up the biggest banks, its  support for offshore drilling, and so on. Yet corporate interests are  balking at even modest changes from the permissiveness of the Bush era. From the outside, this rage against regulation seems bizarre. I mean,  what did they expect? The financial industry, in particular, ran wild  under deregulation, eventually bringing on a crisis that has left 15  million Americans unemployed, and required large-scale taxpayer-financed  bailouts to avoid an even worse outcome&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"> If this sounds familiar, it should: it&rsquo;s the same formula the right has  been using for a generation. Use identity politics to whip up the base;  then, when the election is over, give priority to the concerns of your  corporate donors. Run as the candidate of &ldquo;real Americans,&rdquo; not those  soft-on-terror East coast liberals; then, once you&rsquo;ve won, declare that  you have a mandate to privatize Social Security&#8230;<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"> So where does that leave the president and his party? Mr. Obama wanted  to transcend partisanship. Instead, however, he finds himself very much  in the position Franklin Roosevelt described in a famous 1936 speech,  struggling with &ldquo;the old enemies of peace  &mdash;  business and financial  monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism,  war profiteering.&rdquo; And that&rsquo;s not necessarily a bad thing. Roosevelt turned corporate  opposition into a badge of honor: &ldquo;I welcome their hatred,&rdquo; he declared.  It&rsquo;s time for President Obama to find his inner F.D.R., and do the  same.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">I don&#8217;t have much to say other than, &quot;like Krugman said.&quot; I don&#8217;t think the President needs his &quot;inner F.D.R.&quot; I&#8217;d just love to hear more from the &quot;inner Obama.&quot; <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Some movies are so good that I compliment them by saying &quot;it&#8217;s not a movie &#8211; it&#8217;s a documentary.&quot; Dances with Wolves, The Last Indian, Pulp Fiction, Field of Dreams, Morgan, A Thousand Clowns, Captain Blood. You know, the really great ones. This op-ed by Krugman is like that. It&#8217;s not an opinion. It&#8217;s just [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4120","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4120","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4120"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4120\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4120"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4120"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4120"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}