{"id":4183,"date":"2010-06-16T16:49:34","date_gmt":"2010-06-16T20:49:34","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=4183"},"modified":"2010-06-16T16:56:28","modified_gmt":"2010-06-16T20:56:28","slug":"again","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/06\/16\/again\/","title":{"rendered":"again&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div>No, it&#8217;s not just another rant about Dr. Nemeroff. There are others&#8230;     <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/pogoblog.typepad.com\/pogo\/2010\/06\/a-leader-of-ethics-reform-at-nih-seems-to-think-the-rules-dont-apply-to-him.html\" target=\"_blank\">A Leader of Ethics Reform at NIH Seems to  Think the Rules Don&#8217;t Apply to Him<\/a><br \/>      Project on Government Oversight<\/strong><br \/>      by Ned Feder<br \/>      June 09, 2010<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Now in the news is a controversial decision by <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Dr. Thomas Insel<\/font><\/strong>, a  top official at the National Institutes of Health <strong>[NIH]<\/strong>, to help Dr.  Charles Nemeroff get a new job and a new <strong>NIH<\/strong> grant. Dr. Nemeroff, while  at Emory University, was one of the most <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/10\/04\/health\/policy\/04drug.html?fta=y&#038;pagewanted=all\"><strong>blatant violators<\/strong><\/a> of the <strong>NIH<\/strong>&#8216;s  financial conflict-of-interest <strong>[COI]<\/strong> policies&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">And now we arrive at another incident that occurred while Insel was  Director of NIMH&mdash;one involving a different perpetrator, a medical  researcher in the <strong>NIH<\/strong>&#8216;s intramural program. Dr. P. Trey Sunderland was  the head of an <strong>NIMH<\/strong> research group that studied Alzheimer&#8217;s disease. In  December 2006 he <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/articles.sun-sentinel.com\/2006-12-23\/news\/0612220652_1_government-pfizer-sunderland-future-such-conduct\">pleaded guilty<\/a><\/strong> in a federal court to a criminal  conflict of interest created by payments to him of almost $300,000 from a  drug company for work related to his <strong>NIMH<\/strong> research. In his opening  statement at a House hearing in September 2006, Representative Joe  Barton <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/republicans.energycommerce.house.gov\/108\/News\/09132006_2028.htm\">noted<\/a><\/strong> that Dr. Insel, as the Director of <strong>NIMH<\/strong>, had  recommended a $15,000 retention bonus for Sunderland in January 2006, at  a time when Sunderland&#8217;s <strong>COI<\/strong> violation was <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/printedition\/la-na-nih22dec22-sunderland,0,7566966,full.story\">already well known<\/a><\/strong> [The retention bonus is an  optional government payment whose purpose at NIH is to attract and  retain physicians]. Representative Barton mentioned additional optional  benefits provided by the <strong>NIMH<\/strong> to Dr. Sunderland after his violations of  the <strong>NIH<\/strong>&#8216;s <strong>COI<\/strong> rules were discovered and confirmed.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">The NIH is trying to improve its ethical standards&mdash;and repair its  damaged public image&mdash;by tightening the rules on financial conflicts of  interest. <strong>POGO<\/strong> asks: Is it appropriate for Dr. Insel to lead this  effort? <strong>NIH<\/strong> Director Francis Collins should deal with this question  promptly and publicly. It&#8217;s a problem that should be easy to fix.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">I really don&#8217;t have any beef with Dr. Insel, Chief of the NIMH, but his sensor for misbehavior is either set turned way down or maybe even turned off. Here&#8217;s another case, <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Dr. Trey Sunderland<\/font><\/strong>, where the infractions were well known but Insel just kept on as if things were fine. <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">Sunderland pleads guilty to the charge under a plea agreement in which  he admits to taking &quot;unauthorized&quot; payments from Pfizer, agrees to pay  the government around $300,000, and serve two years&rsquo; probation. For its  part, Pfizer maintains that it broke no laws and breached no ethics.<\/div>\n<div align=\"right\"> [see  <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.historycommons.org\/item.jsp?item=us_health_care_tmln_114\">June 14, 2006<\/a><\/strong>]. [<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/hcrenewal.blogspot.com\/2006\/12\/sunderland-pleads-guilty-to-criminal.html\" target=\"_blank\">Los Angeles  Times, 12\/11\/2006<\/a><\/strong>]<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">But back to Psychiatry as a whole&#8230;    <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.msnbc.msn.com\/id\/37338067\/ns\/health-mental_health\/\">The trouble with psychiatry: One shrink&rsquo;s view<\/a><br \/> Increased  focus on drugs shifts focus from profession&rsquo;s roots in psychology<\/strong><br \/> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"86\" vspace=\"0\" hspace=\"0\" height=\"20\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/msnbcmedia3.msn.com\/i\/msnbc\/Components\/Sources\/Art\/source_Reuters3.gif\" \/><br \/>  May  25, 2010<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">NEW YORK &#8211; Psychiatry has  lost its soul.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">That&#8217;s  how grimly Dr. Daniel Carlat, a psychiatrist in private practice  outside of Boston, characterizes the state of his profession. &quot;Over the last 20 to 30  years, psychiatry has really transformed itself from a profession in  which we try to understand people and understand their psychology &#8211; and  talk to them and help them that way &#8211; into a profession in which we  diagnose diseases, and we medicate those diseases,&quot; says Carlat&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The slide  started, says Carlat, when psychiatric  blockbusters like Prozac, a so-called selective serotonin  reuptake inhibitor, or SSRI, was approved in 1988. Thanks to Prozac and  its cousins such as Zoloft and Paxil, and their relatively limited side  effects, prescriptions grew to the millions. Borrowing the words of late Harvard psychiatrist Dr.  Leon Eisenberg, <strong><font color=\"#200020\">psychiatry went from being &quot;brainless&quot; to being  &quot;mindless,&quot; <\/font><\/strong>Carlat says. Today, psychiatrists spend  20 minutes with a patient every few months, in essence adjusting  medications, compared to an hour or more each week trying to understand  what was wrong&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">While no one completely understands what&#8217;s going on  in the brain of a depressed person, drug makers have been quick to take  advantage of the medical model of mental illness, pushing their own  expensive medicines in dubious ways, Carlat says. And he would know. In  2001, he was contacted by the pharmaceutical giant Wyeth, which offered  him $750 to have a short lunch with primary  care doctors. The basic idea: to tout the company&#8217;s psychiatric drugs,  such as Effexor. Wyeth, later bought by Pfizer, gave him slides and took  him to expensive conferences, where key opinion leaders in the field  would lecture on the newest drug trials. And each time he did his talks,  drug reps would listen in.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">&quot;I knew that if I wanted to get another gig, and  another phone call, another invitation for another $750 check, I was  going to have to say some pretty positive things about their drug, and I  was going to have to downplay some of the negative side effects,&quot;  Carlat says. Finally,  after having made $30,000 and realizing he was just a hired gun, he  started talking frankly about the side effects. The next day, he said, a  drug rep came by his office and asked him if he&#8217;d been sick, as if that  was the only logical explanation for such behavior.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">&quot;Doctors usually are  going to think that other doctors aren&#8217;t going to try to deceive them  about things, but unfortunately, that&#8217;s not true,&quot; says Carlat, who  later wrote about the experience in The New York Times Magazine.  &quot;Doctors are just as vulnerable to the allure of money, marketing and  financial incentives as anybody else.&quot;<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">For example, in 2006, one prominent psychiatrist,  senior National Institutes of Medical Health scientist Pearson &quot;Trey&quot;  Sunderland, was sentenced to two years&#8217; probation for accepting about  $300,000 in consulting fees from Pfizer without first obtaining approval  and disclosing the funding. In response to this and other incidents,  just last week, National Institutes of Health director Dr. Francis  Collins proposed new, more stringent rules about how to manage  researchers&#8217; financial interests in companies whose work is related to  their own. As part  of the new proposal, NIH-funded institutions would be required to post  conflicts of interest on a public website&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">Today, a friend said after reading my flurry of posts about Dr. Nemeroff, &quot;<em>I think Dr. Nemeroff really hurt you.<\/em>&quot;&nbsp; I personally had very little dealing with Dr. Nemeroff. I don&#8217;t know if he could pick me out of a line-up, even though he always greeted me with my first name. But my friend is right. Dr. Nemeroff and his sort really did hurt me. They took over a profession that I loved and turned it into a commodity. I was extremely lucky to have garnered my reputation and referral sources before he came to town, so I had the opportunity to practice Psychiatry in the way I think it should be practiced. But it did hurt to see the field as a whole &quot;lose its soul.&quot; It still hurts. <\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Practicing as I do now for free at several charity clinics is still exciting and interesting. I write a lot of prescriptions [I hope rationally]. But I do a lot of talking and listening too &#8211; just like I was taught to do in the good old days. I work with some psychologists, social workers, and licensed counselors, and we have a fine time trying to figure out the best course of action for the often thorny problems that walk in our doors.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">The thought of doing rapid sessions prescribing drugs based on reported symptoms and not really getting to know the people with those symptoms makes me cringe. Dr. Insel has an important duty at the NIMH, but it&#8217;s not to promote the likes of Sunderland and Nemeroff, it&#8217;s to help us out here practice good medical mental health care [again]&#8230; <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No, it&#8217;s not just another rant about Dr. Nemeroff. There are others&#8230; A Leader of Ethics Reform at NIH Seems to Think the Rules Don&#8217;t Apply to Him Project on Government Oversight by Ned Feder June 09, 2010 Now in the news is a controversial decision by Dr. Thomas Insel, a top official at the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4183","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4183","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4183"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4183\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4183"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4183"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4183"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}