{"id":41908,"date":"2013-11-29T19:32:20","date_gmt":"2013-11-30T00:32:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=41908"},"modified":"2013-11-30T03:34:56","modified_gmt":"2013-11-30T08:34:56","slug":"by-definition","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/11\/29\/by-definition\/","title":{"rendered":"by definition&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<table cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\" border=\"0\" align=\"center\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"158\" vspace=\"6\" hspace=\"6\" height=\"380\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/aha.gif\" \/> If I&#8217;m not a cardiologist and only an Internist in memory, why does this Statin thing get my juices flowing so [<a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/11\/24\/an-exempler\/\">an exempler&hellip;<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/11\/25\/but-i-shouldve\/\">but I should&rsquo;ve&hellip;<\/a>, <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/11\/27\/risk-benefit-ratio\/\">risk benefit ratio&hellip;<\/a>]? I know there are people who are going to&nbsp; take Statins for the same reason a lot of people go to church [&quot;just in case&quot;]. I read the New England Journal article [<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nejm.org\/doi\/full\/10.1056\/NEJMms1314569?query=featured_home\" target=\"_blank\">A Pragmatic View of the New Cholesterol Treatment Guidelines<\/a>] by the editors which stays mostly neutral. I didn&#8217;t want them to be neutral. And every time I read one of these Statin articles, I judge it from the  title, not the content. I think it&#8217;s because it&#8217;s a straw man &#8211; a  surrogate &#8211; for something else I feel, and it doesn&#8217;t take a psychoanalyst to figure out why I might react that way. It&#8217;s the 4&frac12; pages on the right from the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/wp-admin\/circ.ahajournals.org\/content\/early\/2013\/11\/11\/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a.full.pdf#page=52\">American Heart Association Guidelines<\/a>. I&#8217;ve colored in the members of the Task Force who area connected with companies who make Statin drugs. It&#8217;s too much &#8211; simply too much. So I shouldn&#8217;t hide my real motives behind these complaints, I should talk about them directly and get my nose out of a battle where I&#8217;m really not terribly informed. And there&#8217;s a point to this bit of personal introspection. I have a Conflict of Interest just like many of the people on that AHA Task Force. I can&#8217;t read about the Statin controversy without bias &#8211; the emphasis is on the word bias. I can say my opinion is scientific, and it is &#8211; but don&#8217;t you believe&nbsp; for one minute that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m writing it [by the way, you already knew that].<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p align=\"justify\">I don&#8217;t have much flexability in my views about conflict of interest, mainly based on my own<em> internals<\/em>. I can feel bias inside. It&#8217;s part of being a therapist. I can certainly be wrong about myself, but if I pay attention, I&#8217;m fairly accurate in being able to monitor when a patient is getting into an area where I need to be careful about what I say. We call it neutrality, an unachievable goal but a worthy standard to shoot for. And I&#8217;ve become biased about this issue of bias. When somebody says that they can transcend the fact that a company is paying part of their salary and paying to keep their lab and lab&middot;rats going, I balk for two reasons: first, I couldn&#8217;t do that, and second, they always say that as they endorse their sponsor&#8217;s product. You just don&#8217;t hear people coming down on the other side very often [if at all&#8230;].<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">I think this is something the lawyers have gotten very right. If the Lawyer for the Plaintiff can be shown to have a Conflict of Interest, or if the Prosecuting Attorney has a Conflict of Interest, the case can be thrown out of court or the verdict can be overturned. There&#8217;s no gradation in Conflict of Interest, it&#8217;s digital, not analog. The operative saying is,<em> it&#8217;s like being a little bit pregnant<\/em>. I&#8217;m not usually so dogmatic as this, but I suppose I&#8217;ve come by it honestly. I&#8217;ve seen a lot of psychotherapy cases that have gone south because of an unacknowledged bias in the therapist. I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;ve done it too, but at least I worked hard not to, and have sent patients for consultations or referred them on when I wasn&#8217;t sure. I&#8217;m not totally in love with the legal profession, but I think their vigilance in this area is a decided strength.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">So, from my perspective, those pages up there a deal-breakers. I think it&#8217;s inevitable that academics will do drug evaluations and they should fight for their independence [but they rarely do]. But having done that, they should be barred from that panel by definition. Rigid rules. The actual <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/wp-admin\/circ.ahajournals.org\/content\/early\/2013\/11\/11\/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a.full.pdf#page=52\">American Heart Association<\/a> Report, has a real go at trying to play things straight. I just think it&#8217;s impossible<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If I&#8217;m not a cardiologist and only an Internist in memory, why does this Statin thing get my juices flowing so [an exempler&hellip;, but I should&rsquo;ve&hellip;, risk benefit ratio&hellip;]? I know there are people who are going to&nbsp; take Statins for the same reason a lot of people go to church [&quot;just in case&quot;]. I [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41908","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41908","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41908"}],"version-history":[{"count":23,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41908\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41943,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41908\/revisions\/41943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41908"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41908"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41908"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}