{"id":42332,"date":"2013-12-16T11:59:04","date_gmt":"2013-12-16T16:59:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=42332"},"modified":"2013-12-16T12:15:14","modified_gmt":"2013-12-16T17:15:14","slug":"too-deep-to-ignore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/12\/16\/too-deep-to-ignore\/","title":{"rendered":"too deep to ignore&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/loathingbioethics.blogspot.com\/2013\/12\/kaler-on-faculty-senate-resolution-its.html\">Kaler on Faculty Senate resolution: &quot;It&rsquo;s not a review of the Markingson case&quot;<\/a><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><strong><font color=\"#990000\">Fear and Loathing in Bioethics<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"medium\">by Carl Elliot<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"small\">December 11, 2013<\/div>\n<p>     <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">I think we&#8217;re getting a pretty good idea of where the University of  Minnesota administration plans to take the &quot;independent review&quot; endorsed  by the Faculty Senate last week. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.mndaily.com\/news\/campus\/2013\/12\/11\/kaler-talks-markingson-case-bowl-game\">This interview<\/a> with President Kaler appears in today&#8217;s <em>Minnesota Daily<\/em>:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">The Faculty Senate just passed its  resolution to create an independent, external panel to investigate how  the institution conducts clinical research on human subjects. What do  you think of the most recent developments in the Dan Markingson case?<\/div>\n<ol>\n<div align=\"justify\">I&rsquo;m a big believer in shared governance, and so I&rsquo;m willing to take  the advice of the Senate and the panel&hellip; I think they will find that  our review processes are robust and that we do, in fact, protect  patients in clinical trials, but there&rsquo;s been concern raised in how we  do that, and so our goal is to air out clearly and very publicly what we  do and have a panel of external experts validate that and be sure we  are doing this absolutely as well as can be done. It&rsquo;s certainly resulted as a consequence of a lot of repetitive  publicity about the Markingson case, but it&rsquo;s not a review of the  Markingson case; it&rsquo;s a review of what we are doing now and what we&rsquo;re  going to do moving forward.<\/div>\n<\/ol>\n<div align=\"justify\"> This is something that began before you were president. What do you see as your role?<\/div>\n<ol>\n<div align=\"justify\">My role is to look forward, and as I said, that will be the charge of the panel.<\/div>\n<\/ol>\n<\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">And just to reinforce the point, the Daily editorial staff <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.mndaily.com\/opinion\/editorials\/2013\/12\/11\/u-should-move-forward-review\">writes:<\/a><\/div>\n<ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">Though some, including University bioethicists and  professors, may want more answers involving Markingson&rsquo;s death, we  should focus on avoiding potential tragedies and unethical behavior in  the future.<\/div>\n<\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">The resolution passed by the Faculty Senate responded to an <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scribd.com\/doc\/177888896\/Lemmens-Final-Letter-Senate-University-of-Minnesota-Oct-21-2013\">international call<\/a> for  an investigation into the death of Dan Markingson.&nbsp; How would an  investigation that avoids the Markingson case do anything to restore  confidence in the university?<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"> The hallmark of traumatic mental illness is persistence. There are bad things aplenty that can happen, things that may change the course of life forever, and in everyday usage, we sometimes call them <em>traumatic<\/em>. But that misses the essence of traumatic illness &#8211; what we now call PTSD [post traumatic stress disorder]. While overused and often misused, it&#8217;s a surprisingly apt term for the condition &#8211; because it focuses on <em>after<\/em>, what happens <em>after<\/em> a traumatizing experience. Unlike a bad thing that <em>changes<\/em> the course of life, traumatic experience is closer to something that<em> stops<\/em> the course of life.<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Outsiders see the persistence as the problem. &quot;Holding on to your symptoms,&quot; &quot;Stuck in the past,&quot; &quot;Put it behind you,&quot; &quot;Get over it,&quot; &quot;Move on with your life,&quot; &quot;Heal,&quot; &quot;Let it go&quot; &#8211; as if that&#8217;s good advice. But how do you do that when it&#8217;s the single most important determinate of your life? It&#8217;s the attempts at un&middot;happening that cause so much of the problem. The traumatized person&#8217;s task is the opposite, how to live with an open wound that doesn&#8217;t, or can&#8217;t, heal. The afflicted often live their lives knowingly and unknowingly trying to <em>prevent the past<\/em>, un&middot;happening in the future what they couldn&#8217;t un&middot;happen in the past. And all that unhelpful advice entreats them to skip the vital step of knowing in detail what actually happened and recognizing its indelible impact.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">President Kaler and the people at the University of Minnesota aren&#8217;t getting the point. They want to skip an essential step in the same way, to look at policies for the future without acknowledging the truth of what happened in the past. For that matter, the pharmaceutical companies have the same idea, some version of reform that skips the step of acknowledging what is being reformed. The Minnesota Daily editorial staff says, &quot;<em>we  should focus on avoiding potential tragedies and unethical behavior in  the future.<\/em>&quot; And they might as well add &quot;<em>by skipping the <\/em><em>tragedies and unethical behavior of the past<\/em>.&quot; Traumatized people aren&#8217;t wallowing in the past, they are insistent [and persistent] in establishing its reality, knowing, sometimes without knowing why, that it&#8217;s their only salvation [and ours]. It&#8217;s why we have memorials &#8211; Ground Zero, Kennedy&#8217;s flame, the Holocaust, Viet Nam, Gettysburg, Civil Rights. We can&#8217;t change the past, but we can honor it and make sure we know it happened.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In a career of treating people with persistent traumatic illness, I never saw one successful case where there wasn&#8217;t some kind of memorial, public or private, some icon to assure that what happened was never forgotten. And in this last week, we saw footage of a dramatic version, a tribute to Nelson Mandela. One way he did the impossible in South Africa was his Truth and Reconciliation Commission. If the people who committed the atrocities of Apartheid came forward and admitted publicly what they had done, they were granted full amnesty. And if Mandela&#8217;s South Africa survives beyond him, that will likely have been an essential ingredient in why. <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"> A very bright doctor, Harold Wiltshire, visited the battlefield hospitals of World War I and observed that War Neurosis wasn&#8217;t seen in physically wounded soldiers. It was the <em>wound that didn&#8217;t show<\/em>. And there&#8217;s no moving on until it does. The same is true of what&#8217;s happened in Clinical Trials, and for that matter, Medicine as a whole under the corrupting influence of commercial interests. We all know the placemarkers that aren&#8217;t going to go away &#8211; Paxil Study 329, the Dan Markingson Case, the Bipolar Child, etc. The wounds have to show. They&#8217;re just too deep to ignore&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kaler on Faculty Senate resolution: &quot;It&rsquo;s not a review of the Markingson case&quot; Fear and Loathing in Bioethics by Carl Elliot December 11, 2013 I think we&#8217;re getting a pretty good idea of where the University of Minnesota administration plans to take the &quot;independent review&quot; endorsed by the Faculty Senate last week. This interview with [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42332","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42332","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42332"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42332\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42340,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42332\/revisions\/42340"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42332"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42332"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42332"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}