{"id":4350,"date":"2010-09-18T04:20:22","date_gmt":"2010-09-18T08:20:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=4350"},"modified":"2010-09-18T05:10:02","modified_gmt":"2010-09-18T09:10:02","slug":"irresponsible-governance","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/09\/18\/irresponsible-governance\/","title":{"rendered":"irresponsible governance, irresponsible electorate&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.slate.com\/id\/2266025\/entry\/2266816\/\" target=\"_blank\"><font color=\"#200020\">10: Why We Can&#8217;t Ignore Growing Income Inequality<\/font><\/a><\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">&#8230; It is easy to make too much of this, and a few conservatives have done  so in seeking to dismiss the importance [or even existence] of the Great  Divergence. Let&#8217;s look at their arguments.<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Inequality is good<\/font><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Income doesn&#8217;t matter<\/font><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Inequality doesn&#8217;t create unhappiness<\/font><\/strong><\/li>\n<li><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Quality of life is improving<\/font><\/strong> <\/li>\n<li><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Inequality isn&#8217;t increasing<\/font><\/strong> <\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong>Timothy Noah<\/strong> summarizes the conservative arguments that Income Inequity is okay. Read them if you wish. They sound a lot like &quot;<em>Let them eat cake<\/em>&quot;, &quot;<em>We take good care of our darkies<\/em>&quot;, &quot;<em>Women really love being home-makers<\/em>&quot;, etc. In the course of things, he references this graph:      <\/div>\n<p align=\"center\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.people.hbs.edu\/dmoss\/Bank%20Failures,%20Regulation,%20and%20Inequality%20-%20Chart%20with%20Comments%20%28David%20Moss,%20August%202010%29.pdf\"><img decoding=\"async\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/bank_failures.gif\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">The old idiom&nbsp; &quot;break the bank&quot; comes to mind. With high income inequity, the banks literally break. Noah ends his series softly with this paragraph:<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">\n<blockquote>\n<div>What is the ideal distribution of income in society? I couldn&#8217;t tell  you, and historically much mischief has been accomplished by addressing  this question too precisely. But I can tell you this: We&#8217;ve been headed  in the wrong direction for far too long.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote><\/div>\n<h1 align=\"center\"><font color=\"#200020\">what I think..<\/font>.<\/h1>\n<div align=\"justify\">I agree we&#8217;ve been headed in the &quot;wrong direction for far too long,&quot; but I think I can say precisely how long &#8211; <strong><font color=\"#200020\">10,833 days<\/font><\/strong>. It all started on January 20, 1981 &#8211; all of it.  <\/div>\n<p align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"350\" border=\"1\" src=\"http:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/f\/fc\/REAGANMONEYSPEECH2.jpg\" \/><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">We inaugurated Ronald Reagan as President of the United States. He got us out of the Recession of his time by enacting policies that laid the base that guaranteed the current Mega-Recession and Wealth Inequity. <strong><font color=\"#200020\">It was the single most irresponsible act of governance in our history to date &mdash; equaled only later by George W. Bush&#8217;s Invasion of Iraq in 2003. Both things were obviously wrong at the time they happened. <u>We<\/u> elected these men and went along with what they were doing. So these are blatant failures of American Democracy and the American people.<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"> <strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/06\/01\/opinion\/01krugman.html\" target=\"_blank\">Reagan Did It<\/a><br \/>New York Times<\/strong><br \/>By PAUL KRUGMAN<br \/>May 31, 2009<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\"><sup>&ldquo;This bill is the most important legislation for financial  institutions in the last 50 years. It provides a long-term solution for  troubled thrift institutions. &#8230; All in all, I think we hit the  jackpot.&rdquo; So declared Ronald Reagan in 1982, as he signed the Garn-St.  Germain Depository Institutions Act. He was, as it happened, wrong about solving the problems of the  thrifts. On the contrary, the bill turned the modest-sized troubles of  savings-and-loan institutions into an utter catastrophe. But he was  right about the legislation&rsquo;s significance. And as for that jackpot &mdash;  well, it finally came more than 25 years later, in the form of the worst  economic crisis since the Great Depression. For the more one  looks into the origins of the current disaster, the clearer it becomes  that the key wrong turn &mdash; the turn that made crisis inevitable &mdash; took  place in the early 1980s, during the Reagan years.<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><sup>Attacks on  Reaganomics usually focus on rising inequality and fiscal  irresponsibility. Indeed, Reagan ushered in an era in which a small  minority grew vastly rich, while working families saw only meager gains.  He also broke with longstanding rules of fiscal prudence. On the  latter point: traditionally, the U.S. government ran significant budget  deficits only in times of war or economic emergency. Federal debt as a  percentage of G.D.P. fell steadily from the end of World War II until  1980. But indebtedness began rising under Reagan; it fell again in the  Clinton years, but resumed its rise under the Bush administration,  leaving us ill prepared for the emergency now upon us. The  increase in public debt was, however, dwarfed by the rise in private  debt, made possible by financial deregulation. The change in America&rsquo;s  financial rules was Reagan&rsquo;s biggest legacy. And it&rsquo;s the gift that  keeps on taking&#8230;<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><sup>But there was also a  longer-term effect. Reagan-era legislative changes essentially ended New  Deal restrictions on mortgage lending &mdash; restrictions that, in  particular, limited the ability of families to buy homes without putting  a significant amount of money down. These restrictions were put  in place in the 1930s by political leaders who had just experienced a  terrible financial crisis, and were trying to prevent another. But by  1980 the memory of the Depression had faded. Government, declared  Reagan, is the problem, not the solution; the magic of the marketplace  must be set free. And so the precautionary rules were scrapped. Together with looser lending standards for other kinds of consumer credit, this led to a radical change in American behavior.<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><sup>We  weren&rsquo;t always a nation of big debts and low savings: in the 1970s  Americans saved almost 10 percent of their income, slightly more than in  the 1960s. It was only after the Reagan deregulation that thrift  gradually disappeared from the American way of life, culminating in the  near-zero savings rate that prevailed on the eve of the great crisis.  Household debt was only 60 percent of income when Reagan took office,  about the same as it was during the Kennedy administration. By 2007 it  was up to 119 percent. All this, we were assured, was a good  thing: sure, Americans were piling up debt, and they weren&rsquo;t putting  aside any of their income, but their finances looked fine once you took  into account the rising values of their houses and their stock  portfolios. Oops.<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><sup>Now, the proximate causes of today&rsquo;s economic  crisis lie in events that took place long after Reagan left office &mdash; in  the global savings glut created by surpluses in China and elsewhere, and  in the giant housing bubble that savings glut helped inflate. But  it was the explosion of debt over the previous quarter-century that  made the U.S. economy so vulnerable. Overstretched borrowers were bound  to start defaulting in large numbers once the housing bubble burst and  unemployment began to rise. <\/sup><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup><\/sup><sup>These defaults in turn wreaked havoc  with a financial system that &mdash; also mainly thanks to Reagan-era  deregulation &mdash; took on too much risk with too little capital. There&rsquo;s  plenty of blame to go around these days. But the prime villains behind  the mess we&rsquo;re in were Reagan and his circle of advisers &mdash; men who  forgot the lessons of America&rsquo;s last great financial crisis, and  condemned the rest of us to repeat it.<\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p><sup><\/sup><sup> <\/sup><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>10: Why We Can&#8217;t Ignore Growing Income Inequality &#8230; It is easy to make too much of this, and a few conservatives have done so in seeking to dismiss the importance [or even existence] of the Great Divergence. Let&#8217;s look at their arguments. Inequality is good Income doesn&#8217;t matter Inequality doesn&#8217;t create unhappiness Quality of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4350","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4350","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4350"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4350\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4350"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4350"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4350"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}