{"id":4356,"date":"2010-09-20T12:25:23","date_gmt":"2010-09-20T16:25:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=4356"},"modified":"2010-09-20T12:56:21","modified_gmt":"2010-09-20T16:56:21","slug":"exhausting-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/09\/20\/exhausting-2\/","title":{"rendered":"exhausting&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2010\/09\/20\/opinion\/20krugman.html\">The Angry Rich<\/a><br \/>   New York Times<\/strong><br \/>   By PAUL KRUGMAN<br \/>   September 19, 2010<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\"><sup>Anger is sweeping America. True, this white-hot rage is a minority  phenomenon, not something that characterizes most of our fellow  citizens. But the angry minority is angry indeed, consisting of people  who feel that things to which they are entitled are being taken away.  And they&rsquo;re out for revenge. No, I&rsquo;m not talking about the Tea Partiers. I&rsquo;m talking about the rich.<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><sup><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"147\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"1\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/graphics8.nytimes.com\/images\/2006\/04\/02\/opinion\/ts-krugman-190.jpg\" \/>These are terrible times for many people in this country. Poverty,  especially acute poverty, has soared in the economic slump; millions of  people have lost their homes. Young people can&rsquo;t find jobs; laid-off  50-somethings fear that they&rsquo;ll never work again. Yet if you want to find real political rage &mdash; the kind of rage that  makes people compare President Obama to Hitler, or accuse him of treason  &mdash; you won&rsquo;t find it among these suffering Americans. You&rsquo;ll find it  instead among the very privileged, people who don&rsquo;t have to worry about  losing their jobs, their homes, or their health insurance, but who are  outraged, outraged, at the thought of paying modestly higher taxes.<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><sup>The rage of the rich has been building ever since Mr. Obama took office.  At first, however, it was largely confined to Wall Street. Thus when  New York magazine published an article titled &ldquo;The Wail Of the 1%,&rdquo;  it was talking about financial wheeler-dealers whose firms had been  bailed out with taxpayer funds, but were furious at suggestions that the  price of these bailouts should include temporary limits on bonuses.  When the billionaire Stephen Schwarzman compared an Obama proposal to  the Nazi invasion of Poland, the proposal in question would have closed a  tax loophole that specifically benefits fund managers like him.<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><sup><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"0\" align=\"left\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/tycoon.gif\" \/>Now, however, as decision time looms for the fate of the Bush tax cuts  &mdash;   will top tax rates go back to Clinton-era levels?  &mdash;  the rage of the  rich has broadened, and also in some ways changed its character. For one thing, craziness has gone mainstream. It&rsquo;s one thing when a  billionaire rants at a dinner event. It&rsquo;s another when Forbes magazine  runs a cover story  alleging that the president of the United States is deliberately trying  to bring America down as part of his Kenyan, &ldquo;anticolonialist&rdquo; agenda,  that &ldquo;the U.S. is being ruled according to the dreams of a Luo tribesman  of the 1950s.&rdquo; When it comes to defending the interests of the rich, it  seems, the normal rules of civilized (and rational) discourse no longer  apply&#8230;<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><sup><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"150\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"1\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/t2.gstatic.com\/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcRlPDRGwrj7UFjSlpQSwJ94ySEHDmWT0QuH9rAxGxmqiqjyFo4&#038;t=1&#038;usg=__esOj8KHMn_muw29Z3hTdxOtH1Qc=\" \/>You see, the rich are different from you and me: they have more  influence. It&rsquo;s partly a matter of campaign contributions, but it&rsquo;s also  a matter of social pressure, since politicians spend a lot of time  hanging out with the wealthy. So when the rich face the prospect of  paying an extra 3 or 4 percent of their income in taxes, politicians  feel their pain  &mdash; feel it much more acutely, it&rsquo;s clear, than they feel  the pain of families who are losing their jobs, their houses, and their  hopes.<\/sup><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><sup>And when the tax fight is over, one way or another, you can be sure that  the people currently defending the incomes of the elite will go back to  demanding cuts in Social Security and aid to the unemployed. America  must make hard choices, they&rsquo;ll say; we all have to be willing to make  sacrifices. But when they say &ldquo;we,&rdquo; they mean &ldquo;you.&rdquo; Sacrifice is for the little people.<\/sup><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">I love Paul Krugman, even when I disagree with him [and it almost always turns out that he was right after all]. I think the back text of this article is fairly clear. Krugman, like Timothy Noah at Slate, thinks that America is getting close to being able to look rationally at the last decade and realize that we&#8217;ve been taken [by the rich]. I hope they&#8217;re right. We all recall that the CEO&#8217;s kept [and keeps] on giving themselves outrageous bonuses, even with the economy in collapse. They rale at the Public Debt, but don&#8217;t want to be taxed to pay it off. They&#8217;ve done nothing to help the economy they crashed recover. Is Krugman right? Is it time for Americans to shake the scales off our eyes and see that the Robber Barons are at it again? I sure hope so. This is exhausting&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Angry Rich New York Times By PAUL KRUGMAN September 19, 2010 Anger is sweeping America. True, this white-hot rage is a minority phenomenon, not something that characterizes most of our fellow citizens. But the angry minority is angry indeed, consisting of people who feel that things to which they are entitled are being taken [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4356"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4356\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}