{"id":4396,"date":"2010-10-07T20:36:12","date_gmt":"2010-10-08T00:36:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=4396"},"modified":"2010-10-07T20:59:12","modified_gmt":"2010-10-08T00:59:12","slug":"too-real","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/10\/07\/too-real\/","title":{"rendered":"too real&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\">I obviously like blogging. It&#8217;s a fun way to think about things. Writing it down forces me to organize my thoughts into something coherent. I doubt if I&#8217;d like it if it mattered &#8211; I&#8217;d be too worried about being right. So it&#8217;s read by a few friends who are forgiving when I get into left field. It was less fun and more driven back during Bush&#8217;s Presidency. I hated what he was doing to the country, so writing about it was fueled by anger and discomfort. But since then I&#8217;ve felt more relaxed. But sometimes my thoughts take me into an area that relights the fire. I started this last series innocently enough. I just wanted to think about our economic mess from a new perspective. Had we come to a fundamentally new place in our development as a country, or was this downturn what it seemed &#8211; payback for the sins of Wall Street &#8211; a correction? I wasn&#8217;t even thinking about Alan Greenspan, or the housing bubble, or Objectivist Epistemology. But what I found sent me on a chase to find out what others already knew, but I didn&#8217;t.    <\/div>\n<ol>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/10\/03\/the-new-norm\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">the new norm?&hellip;<\/font><\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/10\/04\/skipped-a-step\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">skipped a step&hellip;<\/font><\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/10\/05\/fundamentals\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">fundamentals&hellip;<\/font><\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/10\/06\/back-to-the-future\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">back to the future&hellip;<\/font><\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/10\/06\/collteral-damage-in-a-virtual-reality\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">collteral damage in a virtual reality&hellip;<\/font><\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\"><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/10\/06\/4395\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">one such fraudster&hellip;<\/font><\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<div align=\"justify\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"120\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"1\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/t2.gstatic.com\/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcT1MqjChP2qmfox_0l9d22mA8ODlCvvPuV-hLWbCg1U_xt-X64&#038;t=1&#038;usg=__KqdEw2zuddo-u1d-aQdGLNX2clw=\" \/>Until recently, I haven&#8217;t even really thought much about Ayn Rand since college at the dawn of the 1960&#8217;s. She came up not long ago because a local Tea Party Candidate for the Congress mentioned her in his bio as a formative influence, and Mark Sanford, besmirched Governor of South Carolina, wrote a revival piece about her in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newsweek.com\/id\/219001\/page\/2\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><font color=\"#990000\">Newsweek<\/font><\/strong><\/a> to which I responded [<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/wp-admin\/..\/index.php\/2009\/10\/23\/who-was-ayn-rand-and-who-in-the-hell-is-mark-sanford\/\" target=\"_blank\">who was Ayn Rand? and who in the hell is Mark Sanford?<\/a><\/strong>].<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">I guess I thought of her as important in my development, but it hadn&#8217;t occurred to me that she&#8217;d had an impact on so many others. In those salad days of the late 1950&#8217;s and early 1960&#8217;s [my high school and college years] there were a couple of threads running. There were the classic 1950&#8217;s memes &#8211; the birth of Rock and Roll, &quot;ivy league&quot; clothes, teevee. But there was another scene &#8211; the beatniks, progressive jazz, intellectuals and &quot;pseudo-intellectuals&quot; sitting around talking about deep things in coffee houses &#8211; Zen Buddhism, Nuclear Disarmament, Jack Kerouac, modern art, and even&nbsp;Objectivist Epistemology. Ayn Rand was a romantic figure in that scene &#8211; cigarette holder, artsy friends, sexual liberation, outspoken ideas. Back then, the word &quot;cool&quot; was &quot;cool,&quot; and Ayn Rand fit the bill. I don&#8217;t recall thinking of her as &quot;right wing.&quot; That was reserved for the lunatics in the John Birch society. In my life, Rand was, however, a force that turned me &quot;left.&quot; Once I woke up to the narcissism of her thesis, I started moving the other way and by the next year had found a more personally comfortable place in the growing Civil Rights Movement. But Rand had remained in my mind as a romantic rebel from a formative age.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"210\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"1\" align=\"left\" src=\"http:\/\/assets.portfolio.com\/images\/site\/editorial\/magazine\/2007\/09\/cassidy-greenspan2-large.jpg\" \/>I&#8217;ve kind of enjoyed my former conceptualization of Alan Greenspan. A Jewish kid from New York, kind of ugly in the Woody Allen or Dave Brubeck tradition, who was a hipster playing jazz Clarinet and Sax. I guess I thought of his Ayn Rand days like my own &#8211; a fifties thing and then he moved on. I wondered if he became one of her young lovers. I thought it was cute that he cavorted with Barbara Walters and Andrea Mitchell. An irregular &quot;cool&quot; guy from the days of yore. I had absolutely no clue that he was the prophet and promoter of deregulation that&nbsp; he seems to have been. I had no idea that he never &quot;got over&quot; Ayn Rand like I thought everyone had. Even after I learned about his continued ideological attachments to those ideas, I had no clue that they had driven his actions as Chairman of the Fed. I didn&#8217;t attach the proper valence to his opposition to Brooksley Born. And I guessed that he just made a bad call on the housing bubble. Like most others, I saw him as a goofy looking braniac who deeply understood our economy and made it work. That&#8217;s how he seemed. That&#8217;s how he talked in public. That&#8217;s how he was portrayed on television &#8211; <em><strong>The Maestro<\/strong><\/em>, as Bob Woodward labeled him. Frankly, I never understood a word of what he said when I saw him on the news, but I mistook his ramblings for brilliance instead of bullshit.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Now that I&#8217;ve spent some time looking into his tenure, I&#8217;m appalled. It reminds me of how I felt during the Viet Nam protest days. I supported the student uprisings against the war, but was&nbsp; aghast when the Weathermen started blowing up things. Scream and shake fists, but don&#8217;t put your fantasies into action &#8211; not like that. So after a couple of days of reading Ayn Rand and Alan Greenspan, I&#8217;m still agog. He actually got to be Chairman of the Federal Reserve and ran it operating with the heroic fantasies of a disaffected immigrant author! It just boggles my mind. It&#8217;s one thing to write in 1963:: <\/p>\n<table width=\"90%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"center\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<div align=\"justify\"> &quot;It is precisely the &lsquo;greed&rsquo; of the businessman  or, more appropriately,  his profit seeking which is the unexpected  protector of the consumer. It is in the self-interest of every  businessman to have a  reputation for integrity and a quality product. A  company cannot afford to risk its years of investment by letting down   its standards of quality for one moment or one inferior product; nor   would it be tempted by any potential &lsquo;quick killing,&rsquo;&quot;<\/div>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p align=\"justify\">But it&#8217;s quite another to say in 2008 that he still thought that after&nbsp; getting a PhD in Economics and spending 45 years in the real world of Wall Street. Didn&#8217;t he see the movie?: <\/p>\n<table width=\"90%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"3\" border=\"0\" align=\"center\">\n<tr>\n<td align=\"justify\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Greenspan:<\/font><\/strong>  &quot;Those of us who have looked to the self-interest of lending  institutions  to protect shareholders&rsquo; equity, myself included, are in a  state of  shocked disbelief.&quot;<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p align=\"justify\">It&#8217;s the same feeling I had when I realized that Bush and Cheney had actually drummed up a bogus excuse to invade Iraq. I was incredulous that grown people would put an adolescent fantasy of that magnitude into action in the real world at a cost of billions of dollars and thousands of lives. I&#8217;m still incredulous. I feel the same way about Bin Laden&#8217;s attack on New York. <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">So like with 9\/11, or the Iraq War, waking up to how Greenspan&#8217;s idiosyncratic and naive ideology played out on the world&#8217;s real economic stage is not the fun part of blogging. It&#8217;s just too absurd, and too damn real&#8230;    <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I obviously like blogging. It&#8217;s a fun way to think about things. Writing it down forces me to organize my thoughts into something coherent. I doubt if I&#8217;d like it if it mattered &#8211; I&#8217;d be too worried about being right. So it&#8217;s read by a few friends who are forgiving when I get into [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4396","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4396","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4396"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4396\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4396"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4396"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4396"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}