{"id":4442,"date":"2010-10-29T20:59:46","date_gmt":"2010-10-30T00:59:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=4442"},"modified":"2010-10-29T21:10:19","modified_gmt":"2010-10-30T01:10:19","slug":"a-warning","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/10\/29\/a-warning\/","title":{"rendered":"a warning&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2010\/10\/29\/AR2010102904395.html\" target=\"_blank\">Obama: Suspicious packages are a &#8216;credible terrorist threat&#8217;<\/a><br \/>  Washington Post<\/strong><br \/>  By Greg Miller, Peter Finn and Anne E. Kornblut<br \/>  October 29, 2010<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\"> President Obama said Friday that packages mailed from Yemen and  intercepted in the last 24 hours contained explosive material and  represented a &quot;credible terrorist threat.&quot; The packages, mailed via UPS and FedEx, were addressed to two places of Jewish worship in Chicago, the president said. Obama, speaking four days before the midterm elections, did not specify  any new security measures that would be taken or say that the nation&#8217;s  terrorist alert level had been raised. But he described the threat as  serious, and pointed once again to Yemen as the source, saying his top  terrorism adviser, John Brennan, had been in touch with that country&#8217;s  president. <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"> The two packages were intercepted at different locations, one on a UPS  plane at the East Midlands airport near Nottingham, England, and the  other at a FedEx facility in Dubai. Officials provided no detail on the  kind of explosives found. U.S. counterterrorism officials believe the foiled attack may have been  orchestrated by the al-Qaeda affiliate in Yemen, which has been behind a  series of recent attempts to strike the United States&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/views.washingtonpost.com\/leadership\/guestinsights\/2010\/10\/the-threat-of-politicized-intelligence.html\">The threat of politicized intelligence<\/a><br \/>         Washington Post<\/strong><br \/>        by Mansoor  Ijaz<br \/>        10\/29\/2010<\/div>\n<p>          <\/p>\n<table width=\"98%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"2\" border=\"0\" align=\"center\">\n<tr>\n<td align=\"justify\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"80\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"1\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/views.washingtonpost.com\/leadership\/guestinsights\/X3.%20Mansoor%20IJAZ%20Press%20Photo%20%231.JPG\" \/><em>Mansoor  Ijaz, an American of Pakistani origin, negotiated Sudan&#8217;s offer of  counterterrorism assistance to the Clinton administration in 1996 and  1997 and jointly authored the blueprint for a ceasefire of hostilities  between Indian security forces and militant Islamists in Kashmir in July  and August 2000.  <\/em><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p align=\"justify\">If new US National Security Adviser Thomas E. Donilon needs a  reminder of how stark the enemy threat is, he need look no further than  today&#8217;s discovery of printer cartridges rigged like explosive devices  aboard UPS airliner cargo holds that left Yemen bound for Jewish  Synagogues in the United States. A dry run? You bet. And not just to  test the holes in air cargo security systems, but to test the reaction  time and responsiveness of our national security apparatus&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">  History is replete with bad decisions made by men and women charged  with securing America who lamely, selfishly and often purposefully  politicized intelligence for narrow political objectives&#8230; During both the Clinton and Bush presidencies, political machinations  repeatedly overtook good judgment in assessing the vast amounts of  intelligence gathered by the most formidable surveillance apparatus the  world has ever known. Bill Clinton repeatedly ignored warnings and  advice from people in and out of government about the storm brewing  inside Islam&#8217;s radical fringe. On September 11, 2001, the hypothetical  threat &#8211; ignored and politicized for so many years&#8211;became a harsh  reality. We are living with the consequences of that misjudgment today.    <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Much of the failure to deal with militant Islam inside the Clinton  presidency came from his national security team, which [with the  exception of former counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke] had little  practical experience with military campaigns, counterterrorism  strategies, guerrilla warfare tactics or other facets so critical to  ensuring modern-day security. They repeatedly, and with increasing  stridency, politicized intelligence gathering, analysis and policy  responses&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In February 1996 Sudan&#8217;s dictator, Omar Hasan El Bashir, pinched by  US economic sanctions, offered to trade Osama bin Laden&#8217;s freedom in  return for US economic sanctions on Khartoum being removed to allow  development of Sudan&#8217;s oil riches. President Clinton refused the  entreaty, arguing the US did not have any evidence of crimes committed  by bin Laden against the United States and therefore had no grounds to  arrest him or have him extradited from Sudan to the US. Yet evidence of  bin Laden&#8217;s complicity in attacks against US interests prior to 1996  existed. Unfortunately, the evidence existed only in CIA files that  Clinton never bothered to read with any regularity because he did not  trust the intelligence community&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In 1997, the Sudanese offered up their intelligence files on bin  Laden, Al Qaeda and other Muslim extremist groups to the FBI and CIA,  this time without conditions. In those files, detailed data existed  about men [among them Mamdouh Mahmud Salim, who traveled frequently to  Germany to obtain electronic equipment for Al Qaeda, and Mamoun  Darkazanli, a Syrian trader and Al Qaeda&#8217;s accountant] who later formed  the Hamburg Al Qaeda cell that sheltered Mohamed Atta and Marwan  Al-Shehhi, two of the pilots that slammed US airliners into the World  Trade Center on September 11th.<\/p>\n<p align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" hspace=\"2\" height=\"120\" border=\"1\" src=\"http:\/\/www.colorado.edu\/news\/r\/ca540029af48d17de172e9b27b2fd6a6\/Madeleine-Albright.jpg\" alt=\"Madeline Albright\" title=\"Madeline Albright\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" hspace=\"2\" height=\"120\" border=\"1\" src=\"http:\/\/graphics8.nytimes.com\/images\/2005\/04\/01\/national\/01berger.1841.jpg\" alt=\"Samuel Berger\" title=\"Samuel Berger\" \/><img decoding=\"async\" hspace=\"2\" height=\"120\" border=\"1\" src=\"http:\/\/natna.files.wordpress.com\/2009\/12\/susan-rice.jpg?w=199&#038;h=300\" alt=\"Susan Rice\" title=\"Susan Rice\" \/><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">I negotiated that offer and hand-carried Bashir&#8217;s letter from  Khartoum to Washington in April of that year. Six months later,  Secretary of State <strong>Madeleine Albright<\/strong> accepted the offer &#8211; only to be  overruled a few days later by <strong>Samuel R. Berge<\/strong>r, Clinton&#8217;s national  security adviser at the time, and <strong>Susan E. Rice<\/strong>, then the incoming  assistant secretary of state for East Africa. That a decision resulting  from an in-depth interagency government process could be overruled by a  narrow White House clique [because of personal misgivings about Sudan&#8217;s  veracity, or the agendas of American allies in the region that wanted to  break up Sudan, or the political infighting that erupted between Berger  and Albright about operational boundaries and limits on authority]  clearly showed the dangers of politicizing intelligence and making  policy on the basis of feel rather than fact.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">I&#8217;d never heard about that before. Maybe it was known, but not by me. Admittedly, we&#8217;re looking through a retrospectoscope, but it sounds as if it was a political decision rather than a tactical error. I&#8217;m thinking that in the final telling of this whole 9\/11, Afghanistan, Iraq story, no one will emerge unscathed. Bad decisions piled on top of each other to radically change the history of our country. I think it&#8217;s courageous of <u><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Mansoor_Ijaz\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Mansoor Ijaz<\/font><\/strong><\/a><\/u> to write this piece. I hope someone listens to him.    <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">In February 2003, a man of no less stature than Gen. Colin Powell got  caught in the same trap when he appeared as President George W. Bush&#8217;s  secretary of state in front of the world at the United Nations. He  argued that Saddam Hussein was removing Mobile Production Facilities for  biological weapons of mass destruction from Iraq, and that as a result  of incontrovertible American &quot;evidence&quot;, the world had a moral  obligation to go in and remove Saddam from power. The trailers were  later found to have no trace of biological warfare. No weapons of mass  destruction were ever found in Iraq. The narrow clique that ruled White  House policymaking at the time [Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul  Wolfowitz, etc] simply bulldozed friend and foe alike into supporting  the Iraq invasion because they had a world view, facts be damned to  hell. A trillion dollars later, with an Iraqi nation decimated by war  and mishandled in its aftermath&#8230;<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Is that the best we can do today with the bright minds we have in  America? Internal cohesion and smooth operations of the national  security team based on feel-good backhanding is no replacement for hard  analysis of facts on the ground. Donilon needs to crack that whip first,  not last &#8211; and he needs to do it fast&#8230;<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">Politicized intelligence was the Achilles heel of many a past  president, with disastrous consequences emerging every single time.  President Obama must insure that the principal legacy left by his  outgoing national security adviser &#8211; integrity of the intelligence  analysis and policy-response process, and a strategic vision for  securing America against an ever growing array of threats &#8211; remains the  baseline from which America makes its national-security policy  decisions. If he does not, he may find one day soon that the very  terrorists he was elected to thwart have come home to roost&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div>Nine years ago, we were attacked. Our response was so wrong as to be the stuff of legend for all times. And here we sit. Same problem&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Obama: Suspicious packages are a &#8216;credible terrorist threat&#8217; Washington Post By Greg Miller, Peter Finn and Anne E. Kornblut October 29, 2010 President Obama said Friday that packages mailed from Yemen and intercepted in the last 24 hours contained explosive material and represented a &quot;credible terrorist threat.&quot; The packages, mailed via UPS and FedEx, were [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4442"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4442\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}