{"id":4444,"date":"2010-10-30T06:17:26","date_gmt":"2010-10-30T10:17:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=4444"},"modified":"2010-10-30T06:55:04","modified_gmt":"2010-10-30T10:55:04","slug":"the-gospel-of-no-pref","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2010\/10\/30\/the-gospel-of-no-pref\/","title":{"rendered":"the gospel of &#8220;no pref&#8221;&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"> <strong><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/shrinkrap13.blogspot.com\/2010\/10\/dadt-is-dead-6.html\">DADT is dead #6<\/a><\/strong><br \/>            <strong><font color=\"#ff3300\">ShrinkRap<\/font><\/strong><br \/>            10\/30\/2001<\/div>\n<p>            <\/p>\n<div>\n<div align=\"justify\">Silly reason #39 not to repeal DADT:  &quot;Freedom of religion.&quot; A   group of 65 retired military chaplains has sent a letter to President   Obama and Secretary of Defense Gates presenting what they consider an   insurmountable problem if DADT is repealed.  For some chaplains it will   become &quot;impossible to serve both God and the military.&quot;<\/div>\n<ul>\n<div>If a  chaplain preaches against homosexuality, he could be considered a bigot.<\/div>\n<\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">Well,  yes, of course.  How is that different from a Catholic priest  telling a  woman that her abortion is a mortal sin?   Should the military  kick  out anyone who has an abortion &#8211; or might have an abortion, both men  and women &#8211; in order  not to pose priests with a dilemma?<\/div>\n<p>             <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">How do  you minister in a pastoral way to someone who does not share your  religious beliefs?   That should have been covered in Pastoral Care 101.   Is their military mission to convert everyone to their faith &#8211; or is  it to provide pastoral care to all the troops and their families?  And,  if you can&#8217;t do that, should you be a military chaplain? &#8230; why do we provide  military chaplains anyway?    What&#8217;s the government doing in the  business of having sectarian clergy  on the payroll if they think  they&#8217;re there &quot;to save souls&quot; according to their own sectarian beliefs?&#8230; They should be worried that the whole  concept of military chaplains could be called into question&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">big&middot;ot [\u00cb\u02c6b\u00c9\u00aa\u00c9\u00a1\u00c9\u2122t\u00cb\u02c6]<\/font><br \/>           -noun<\/strong><br \/>      &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;a person who is intolerant of any ideas other than his or her own &#8211; religion, politics, or race.<br \/>      &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;[Old French: name applied contemptuously to the Normans by the French, obscure origin]<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">How about  <strong><font color=\"#000000\">&para; Thou shalt not kill<\/font><\/strong>? I expect a Chaplain who preached against killing might only last in the Military for a few hours. But here is the essence of the whole issue, &quot;Should the military  kick  out anyone &#8230; in order  not to pose priests  with a dilemma?&quot; The argument of the 65 military chaplains is slanted wrong. Chaplains are for soldiers, not the other way around [Doctors too]. It&#8217;s really that simple. <strong><font color=\"#ff3300\">ShrinkRap<\/font><\/strong> has hit the center of this question &#8211; DADT is for the bigot not the soldier. That&#8217;s not right&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><img decoding=\"async\" vspace=\"4\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/nopref.gif\" \/>I am reminded of my own induction into the Air Force. I had filled out some form along the way. Under religion, I had written &quot;Zen Buddhist.&quot; I&#8217;ll admit to not having been in a very good mood about the whole process that day, and was probably being a bit facetious &#8211; though it was the most accurate answer at that point in my life. I was called out of a class to go to the personnel office. It was about that answer. &quot;Zen Buddhist&quot; wasn&#8217;t allowed, I was told. It turned out that the issue was that it was for dog tags [with that second one for your toe in case you get shot or killed]. I tried &quot;Zen,&quot; &quot;Buddhist,&quot; &quot;Other,&quot; and &quot;None&quot; with no luck. As it turned out, there were only a limited number of choices &#8211; &quot;Catholic,&quot; &quot;Protestant,&quot; &quot;Jewish,&quot; and &quot;No Pref.&quot; So I was converted that day to the gospel of &quot;No Pref.&quot; It had to do with which Chaplain got called if I got wounded or who visited me in the hospital if I got sick. I later told this story to a friend over a beer, the Chaplain who came to the hospital where I worked. He thought it was pretty funny and we had a fine laugh about the silliness of the Military Bureaucracy. He had some really funny stories to tell too [I can&#8217;t recall them exactly, but one had to do with the <strong><font color=\"#000000\">&para; Thou shalt not kill <\/font><\/strong>thing].<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">In actual practice, I was pretty impressed with the military chaplains. They were very helpful, and did what was needed for the person in front of them &#8211; independent of what the dog tag said&#8230;  <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>DADT is dead #6 ShrinkRap 10\/30\/2001 Silly reason #39 not to repeal DADT: &quot;Freedom of religion.&quot; A group of 65 retired military chaplains has sent a letter to President Obama and Secretary of Defense Gates presenting what they consider an insurmountable problem if DADT is repealed. For some chaplains it will become &quot;impossible to serve [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4444"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4444\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}