{"id":45442,"date":"2014-04-08T23:24:59","date_gmt":"2014-04-09T03:24:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=45442"},"modified":"2014-04-08T23:24:59","modified_gmt":"2014-04-09T03:24:59","slug":"kudus-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2014\/04\/08\/kudus-2\/","title":{"rendered":"kudus&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\">While I have no business in the details of legal matters, I was really glad to read this article. It&#8217;s part of the fallout from the TMAP scam that has been dragging on now for ten long years:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.canada.com\/news\/Arkansas+asks+state+Supreme+Court+reconsider+tossing+Johnson+Johnson\/9711626\/story.html\">Arkansas AG asks state Supreme Court to reconsider its tossing of $1.2B Johnson &amp; Johnson fine<\/a><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">The Associated Press<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\">By Andrew Demillo<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"small\">April 7, 2014<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel asked the state Supreme Court on Monday to reconsider its decision tossing out a $1.2 billion judgment against drugmaker Johnson &amp; Johnson, saying justices did &quot;significant harm&quot; to the state and broke from 170 years of precedent. McDaniel filed a petition for rehearing over the high court&#8217;s decision last month that the state misapplied the Medicaid fraud law in its lawsuit against New Jersey-based Johnson &amp; Johnson and its subsidiary Janssen Pharmaceutical Inc. over the marketing of the antispyschotic drug Risperdal. McDaniel said last week that he would ask the court to revisit the ruling. &quot;The court&#8217;s rejection of the state [Medicaid fraud] case does significant harm to the state and its citizens,&quot; McDaniel wrote in the filing. &quot;It deprives the state of a critical tool to protect the integrity of the Arkansas Medicaid program and the vulnerable poor, sick and elderly who depend on Medicaid as a literal lifeline.&quot;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">McDaniel said justices broke with years of precedent by ruling on grounds not previously raised in filings. Justices ruled that the state Code Revision Commission &quot;substantively altered&quot; the meaning of the Medicaid fraud law when it was codified and that it was originally intended to regulate health facilities. The commission is responsible for making technical corrections to state code. McDaniel noted that the 1993 law remained unchanged for 21 years despite other amendments and attempted amendments by the Legislature over the years. &quot;By improperly transforming a well understood and accepted interpretation of the law, this court has arrogated to itself powers not conferred by the Arkansas Constitution or the General Assembly,&quot; he wrote.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">The drugmaker said in a statement Monday that it didn&#8217;t violate the Medicaid fraud law. &quot;After a thorough review of the case, the Arkansas Supreme Court agreed with our position. We believe that the record speaks for itself and are prepared to vigorously defend our position,&quot; the company said. Risperdal was introduced in 1994 as a &quot;second-generation&quot; antipsychotic drug, and it earned Johnson &amp; Johnson billions of dollars in sales before generic versions became available. The drug is used to treat schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and irritability in autism patients. An Arkansas jury found the New Jersey-based companies liable in 2012. Pulaski County Circuit Judge Tim Fox then ordered the companies to pay $5,000 for each of the 240,000 Risperdal prescriptions for which Arkansas&#8217; Medicaid program paid during a 3 1\/2-year span.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div>In <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2014\/03\/21\/champagne-around\/\">champagne around&hellip;<\/a>, I wrote:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">After their settlement in Texas, J&amp;J lost a number of similar suits &ndash;  Louisiana, South Carolina, Arkansas. Having sat through the Texas  trial, it&rsquo;s hard for me to imagine how they could win. The off-label  marketing, hiding side effects, giving out perks, etc. It was just  rampant. I think they settled in Texas because they could tell [as could  everyone in the courtroom] that if they let the trial proceed, they  stood the chance of getting massacred. But in the other suits, they went  to the end &ndash; losing the verdicts. <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Now, they&rsquo;re neutralizing their  losses one at a time on technicalities<\/font><\/strong>.&nbsp;  <\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">To my way of thinking, the TMAP epidemic which had taxpayer money diverted into the J&amp;J Bank Account based on an orchestrated fraud was the most cynical of the many underhanded marketing schemes in the world of psychopharmacology. To have hard won juried decisions thrown out on clever legal technicalities just adds insult to injury. I didn&#8217;t go to the Arkansas Trial, or to South Carolina, but I went to Texas, and what I heard there made me ashamed of medical care in general. Doctors, Administrators, Pharmaceutical Companies, and their paid sales force &#8211; everybody was behaving in a way I can only see as criminal, antisocial. These settlements are our only recourse, and I want them to stick instead of getting lost in the details of legalisms and clever argument. &quot;<em>&#8230; 240,000 Risperdal prescriptions for which Arkansas&#8217; Medicaid program paid during a 3 1\/2-year span!<\/em>&quot; <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Kudus to Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel!<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While I have no business in the details of legal matters, I was really glad to read this article. It&#8217;s part of the fallout from the TMAP scam that has been dragging on now for ten long years: Arkansas AG asks state Supreme Court to reconsider its tossing of $1.2B Johnson &amp; Johnson fine The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-45442","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45442","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=45442"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45442\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":45444,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/45442\/revisions\/45444"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=45442"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=45442"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=45442"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}