![](\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/recovery.gif\")
]<\/div>\n- <\/p>\n
- \nThe act, process, duration, or an instance of recovering.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n
- \n
A return to a normal condition.<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/li>\n- \n
Something gained or restored in recovering.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n- \n
The act of obtaining usable substances from unusable sources.<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<\/span><\/ol>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n
In its effectiveness…<\/a> I was fretting about the Individual Resiliency Training<\/a> [IRT] that is part of the RAISE ETP Project. It’s a structured program for patients and families following the first episode of psychosis. Unlike the other things I write about here, I thought it was well-meaning and some people have obviously put a lot of thought into writing it. I’ve mused about what bothered me so much about it. The most obvious thing might be more about me than the point of the manual. I find myself put off when approached with that much structure – it feels distancing. It’s like talking to a drug rep who has something to sell, some direction he wants to take me in, and I feel like I’m talking to an background agenda rather than a person. But that might also be something I’ve learned about this particular group of patients, they’re always looking for the hidden meaning behind the words, even in very clear communications. And a lot of the modules have that feel – strategizing to get the patient to think some certain way. And strategies breed paranoia in this group. But that’s not all that bothers me.<\/p>\n
Just like the word Resilience<\/font><\/strong><\/em>, I have some difficulty with the word recovery<\/font><\/strong><\/em>. I get that it means not psychotic anymore. But it implies that the patient used to be fine<\/em>, normal<\/em>, and then psychosis came, and the goal is to get back to fine<\/em> again. I’ve seen a lot of these patients and had the privilege to follow a few for a long time [one mentioned in 1. from n equals one<\/em>…<\/a>. [and 2. from n equals one<\/em>…<\/a>, 3. from n equals one<\/em>…<\/a>, etc]. When I’ve gotten to hear about the patient’s experience before the overt psychosis, things may have looked fine<\/em>, but they weren’t at all fine<\/em> inside. And with the families, there has always been a background worry, some kind of special vigilance for this particular child – not fine<\/em>. Bleuler talked about that a hundred years ago, calling it the Schizoid Personality. It’s the thing Professor McGorry and others want to be able to identify – a pre·<\/font><\/strong>psychotic syndrome that could be treated before the outbreak of psychosis. I agree with their premise, but I don’t think we yet know how to do that. So I’m not arguing with the word recovery<\/font><\/strong><\/em> itself, but with the idea that there’s been a stable place to recover<\/font><\/strong><\/em> to. I see the psychosis as just the outward manifestation of an ongoing condition. And my best success has come when the patient can look back on those earlier days and address them as part of the problem.<\/p>\n
What are those qualities that are often seen before and after a psychotic episode? Bleuler described them as shy people who replaced interpersonal experience with other pursuits, and were uncharacteristically explosive when frustrated. These patients often describe a predominant feeling of inner tension and "not fitting in" that has always been present. Their intuitive compass isn’t pointed by positive emotions, or directed by desires, but is rather driven by worries and towards ways to achieve tension reduction. They may edit the school paper or be a head cheerleader, but there’s no joy in the enterprise, just relief when it’s over. And identity formation, the task of adolescence, may be remarkably stunted. The patient above was in her senior year of college about to graduate Magna Cum Laude with a Liberal Arts degree, but had no idea what came next. The family sent one of her siblings on a visit to help her. Her sister got a legal pad and pencil and asked her to write down all the things she had been interested in or had thought about doing. The patient-to-be was paralyzed, thinking, "That’s what I am, a blank page." That was two years before her first psychotic episode. Three of Bleuler’s diagnostic "A-s" are almost always there before there are any signs of psychosis: Anhedonia<\/em>, the absence of pleasurable emotion; Ambivalence<\/em>, problems resolving conflicting emotions; and Abstraction<\/em>, problems seeing the abstract meanings – sticking to the literal. Knowing in a felt way what you want is required for that intuitive compass<\/em> I mentioned, and these patients to a greater or lesser degree just don’t seen to have such a mechanism in place. You will recognize that this paragraph might fill the bill for the "negative symptoms" we often read about – the ones medication doesn’t seem to help. If you look carefully, this stuff is there before the psychotic episode, though it may be well concealed.<\/p>\n
- \n