{"id":46537,"date":"2014-05-25T14:46:19","date_gmt":"2014-05-25T18:46:19","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=46537"},"modified":"2014-05-25T21:08:50","modified_gmt":"2014-05-26T01:08:50","slug":"a-decision-to-reconsider","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2014\/05\/25\/a-decision-to-reconsider\/","title":{"rendered":"a decision to reconsider&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div align=\"justify\">Reading and rereading the response of the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ema.europa.eu\/docs\/en_GB\/document_library\/Other\/2014\/05\/WC500167426.pdf\">European Medicines Agency<\/a> to the <strong><font color=\"#200020\">European Ombudsman<\/font><\/strong> posted in <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2014\/05\/24\/to-be-continued\/\">to be continued&hellip;<\/a>, I can only conclude that someone has done a powerful sales job about what they call the <em>view-on-screen-only<\/em> system [a self contained &quot;remote desktop&quot;] &#8211; selling it as something it neither is nor can become. <\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">As I said earlier [<a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2014\/05\/23\/the-end-game\/\">the end game&hellip;<\/a>], as a member of the               RIAT team who was granted access to the Data from Paxil               Study 329 to do an independent reanalysis by GSK, we&#8217;ve now had               months of experience working with their &quot;remote desktop&quot;               interface as a portal to their information. It is a single               windowed multiple document interface, totally self               contained that can&#8217;t be accessed by any software other               than that provided inside the window. Multiple passwords are required multiple                 times for access, and on some days, one is frequently                 thrown from the system without warning, necessitating                 repeated logins. There&#8217;s another internal window               from SAS that contains the data and allows one to run SAS               programs to analyze the data. The data is also provided as text-based CSV files that can               be moved outside the internal SAS window and displayed in               spreadsheets [Open Office is provided]. The open source               statistical program, &quot;R&quot; is also provided. In our case having no-one fluent in SAS procedures and programming, we               are using &quot;R&quot; which has the necessary statistical               functions. Getting the data into the proper format required by &quot;R&quot; means using multiple spreadsheets &#8211; which is very difficult in the cramped space               provided &#8211; sometimes taking days and involving many &quot;start-overs.&quot; Once the data is               analyzed, one can only export non-data containing files               with results, and that&#8217;s only by application for approval. Using the               primitive graphing functions of Open Office or &quot;R&#8217; in the               &quot;remote desktop&quot; is very difficult and the graphs can&#8217;t be exported. That finally lead us to               copy the information for the graphs by hand to get it into the computer               proper to create our images. The process of using this               interface for analysis is unnecessarily maddening and a               severe obstruction to the task.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">                The original hand written CRFs are provided as PDF documents. In our case, there               are some 275 subjects, many with several pdfs, each pdf               containing 200+pages. In the interface provided, we can               see only one page at a time of the nearly 60,000 pages.               Tallying the adverse events from the pdfs is hard enough               work, but doing to without being able to make printed               copies and referring back and forth is a double nightmare, requiring days of wasted time,               and delegation is impossible. Working inside of this little window brings home how important it is to have a workspace that allows simultaneous display of lots of information, and this isn&#8217;t it. One                 of our team has lost one assistant already over this                 interface. The EMA&#8217;s decision to even consider               using this kind of interface is at best, ill               advised, and a negation of the initial promise of Data               Transparency. If I weren&#8217;t retired and instead had a job to do, I don&#8217;t think I could do it. If I were       a graduate student given the task, I might go to the chairman of the department and       ask for another major professor. It&#8217;s impossible to imagine that anyone               contemplating this decision who knows the ins and outs of data analysis has tried it out in this kind of environment. As I said before, it&rsquo;s like going to sea to see the world in a submarine, looking through a periscope.   <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">I expect the EMA means well, and may think that since the data is available in this system, it should be okay.. But they apparently don&#8217;t realize the practical burden that it inflicts on anyone trying to have a serious look at a clinical trial. At the least, I would hope they would sit someone down in front of a computer using such a system so they can see with hands-on what I&#8217;m talking about &#8211; that I&#8217;m not being melodramatic.  <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Reading and rereading the response of the European Medicines Agency to the European Ombudsman posted in to be continued&hellip;, I can only conclude that someone has done a powerful sales job about what they call the view-on-screen-only system [a self contained &quot;remote desktop&quot;] &#8211; selling it as something it neither is nor can become. As [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-46537","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=46537"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46537\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":46548,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/46537\/revisions\/46548"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=46537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=46537"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=46537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}