{"id":4663,"date":"2011-02-06T00:49:09","date_gmt":"2011-02-06T05:49:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=4663"},"modified":"2011-02-06T00:50:40","modified_gmt":"2011-02-06T05:50:40","slug":"memory-lane-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2011\/02\/06\/memory-lane-4\/","title":{"rendered":"memory lane&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div align=\"justify\">I ran across this piece about Scott Bloch today, a familiar name from the Bush era. It&#8217;s not such an important story &#8211; just wrangling about his sentence. But it reminds me how crazy things were during the Bush years. He was a Republican operative in charge of the whistle-blower protection office whose job it was to keep the office from functioning. He got in trouble for actually doing his real job in an attempt to cover up for the fact that he hadn&#8217;t done his real job. It was really that crazy only a few years ago. Maybe things are confusing now, but the confusion doesn&#8217;t hold a candle to the corruption and confusion during Bush&#8217;s reign. I&#8217;ve revived my post about Bloch from those days below: <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/wp-dyn\/content\/article\/2011\/02\/03\/AR2011020303180.html?sid=ST2011020503776\" target=\"_blank\">Bush whistle-blower protector faces jail<\/a><br \/>  Washington Post<\/strong><br \/>  By Spencer S. Hsu<br \/>  February 3, 2011<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\"> <img decoding=\"async\" width=\"120\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"1\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/citizenchris.typepad.com\/citizenchris\/images\/2008\/05\/07\/blochscottlarge.jpg\" \/>A federal judge has ruled that the former head  of a federal whistle-blower protection office could face at least one  month in prison for withholding information from congressional  investigators, a decision that could derail a plea deal with  prosecutors. Scott J. Bloch pleaded guilty  in April to criminal contempt of Congress for withholding that he  ordered private technicians to &quot;scrub&quot; computer files at the Office of  Special Counsel in December 2006. His sentencing was set for last July, but it was postponed  after watchdog groups criticized an arrangement in which Bloch admitted  guilt to a single misdemeanor charge that carries a sentence of up to  six months in prison, and prosecutors did not oppose his request for  probation. <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"> Groups that advocate ethics in government said that probation would  understate the effect of Bloch&#8217;s abuses during George W. Bush&#8217;s  administration. Bloch gained notoriety for ordering the office to erase all references  to workplace discrimination based on sexual orientation, saying his  office lacked the authority to protect gay and lesbian employees. He was  removed from the office after a meeting with White House officials in  October 2008&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div>This is my post about him from several years ago called <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2008\/05\/07\/send-help\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong><font color=\"#400040\">send help&#8230;<\/font><\/strong><\/a><\/div>\n<p>     <\/p>\n<table width=\"98%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"2\" border=\"0\" align=\"center\">\n<tr>\n<td>\n<div align=\"center\"><strong><font color=\"#400040\">This is a <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2008\/05\/07\/send-help\/\" target=\"_blank\"><u>post<\/u><\/a> I made on May 7th, 2008<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<hr size=\"1\" \/> <\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><sup> <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">Remember Scott Bloch? This time last year [04\/24\/2007] I read this with high hopes:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<div align=\"center\"><u><a href=\"http:\/\/www.latimes.com\/news\/politics\/la-na-probe24apr24,0,3535547.story?coll=la-home-headlines\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Low-key office launches high-profile inquiry<\/strong><\/a><\/u><br \/>                                       The Office of Special Counsel will  investigate U.S. attorney firings and other political activities led by  Karl Rove<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Most  of the time, an obscure federal investigative unit known as the Office  of Special Counsel confines itself to monitoring the activities of  relatively low-level government employees, stepping in with reprimands  and other routine administrative actions for such offenses as  discriminating against military personnel or engaging in prohibited  political activities.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">  But the Office of Special Counsel is preparing to jump into one of the  most sensitive and potentially explosive issues in Washington, launching  a broad investigation into key elements of the White House political  operations that for more than six years have been headed by chief  strategist Karl Rove.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">  The new investigation, which will examine the firing of at least one  U.S. attorney, missing White House e-mails, and White House efforts to  keep presidential appointees attuned to Republican political priorities,  could create a substantial new problem for the Bush White House.<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">&#8230;<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">The  decision by Bloch&#8217;s office is the latest evidence that Rove&#8217;s  once-vaunted operations inside the government, which helped the GOP hold  the White House and Congress for six years, now threaten to mire the  administration in investigations.<\/div>\n<p>                                   <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">The  question of improper political influence over government  decision-making is at the heart of the controversy over the firing of  U.S. attorneys and the ongoing congressional investigation of the  special e-mail system installed in the White House and other government  offices by the Republican National Committee.<\/div>\n<\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">But later in the day, I wrote:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">In  my last post, I read the L.A. Times article about the investigation of  Rove, and felt excited. Was it possible that there would be a real  investigation. So I wrote my first few paragraphs? Then I looked up the <strong>Office of Special Counsel<\/strong>.  I wondered, &quot;Had someone found an Agency uncontaminated by the  Administration?&quot; and wrote some more. Then, I put Scott Bloch into <strong>Google<\/strong>, and found that others had already discovered that he was a <u><a href=\"http:\/\/www.alternet.org\/rights\/22000\/\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Republican Operative<\/strong><\/a><\/u> extrordinaire.<\/div>\n<p>                 <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">What I <u><strong>hate<\/strong><\/u> is being put in the position of being cynical enough these days to be <strong>Googling<\/strong>  Scott Bloch immediately to be sure this isn&#8217;t a fraudulent  investigation to run out their clock in office and cover-up the whole  thing. I <u><strong>hate<\/strong><\/u> that they&#8217;ve done this to us &#8211; turned us  into a bunch of reflex paranoids. Only, unfortunately, we&#8217;re  &quot;pseudo-paranoid,&quot; because, as usual, our skepticism and suspicions turn  out to be right.<\/div>\n<\/ul>\n<div>Yesterday, we read this:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<div align=\"center\"><u><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2008\/05\/07\/washington\/06cnd-inquire.html?_r=1&#038;hp&#038;oref=slogin\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>F.B.I. Raids Office of Special Counsel<\/strong><\/a><\/u><\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">The  office of the official responsible for protecting federal workers from  political interference was raided by F.B.I. agents on Tuesday as part of  an investigation into whether he himself mixed politics with official  business.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">The raid took place at the office  of Scott J. Bloch, the head of the Office of Special Counsel. Computers  and documents were seized by agents trying to determine whether Mr.  Bloch obstructed justice by hiring an outside company to &ldquo;scrub&rdquo; his  computer files, The Associated Press reported. Investigators also  searched Mr. Bloch&rsquo;s home in suburban Virginia after obtaining a  subpoena.<\/div>\n<div>&#8230;<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">Mr. Bloch was in the  news a year ago when his office began to look into political briefings  given to employees of several agencies by aides to Karl Rove, who was  then President Bush&rsquo;s chief political adviser. The White House insisted  at the time that the briefings met the definitions of allowable  activities. <\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Mr. Bloch&rsquo;s critics quickly  accused him of announcing an inquiry into the Rove-inspired briefings  simply to draw attention away from his own shortcomings. At the time, he  was the target of a complaint filed by a group of employees who accused  him of trying to dismantle his own agency, of illegally barring  employees from talking to journalists and of reducing a backlog of  whistle-blower complaints by simply discarding old cases&#8230;<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">Last  week, the White House forced out Lurita A. Doan, the head of the  General Services Administration, after Mr. Bloch&rsquo;s office determined  that she had improperly mixed politics with government business&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\">Speculations  are already beginning to circulate on the Internet. Is he being  punished for investigating Rove, Doan, or is he finally being targeted  as a Republican Operative? So, today:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<div align=\"center\"><u><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/world\/2008\/may\/07\/usa\"><strong>Republicans call for testimony from US special counsel<\/strong><\/a><\/u><\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Republicans  in Congress today called for a subpoena to force testimony from Scott  Bloch, the US special counsel whose mission is helping government  whistleblowers, after law enforcement agents carried out a daylong raid  on his home and office. The FBI is probing whether Bloch, who leads the  office of the special counsel (OSC), destroyed evidence relevant to a  White House misconduct inquiry against him. He has been caught in a bind  for a year, investigating the Bush administration for misuse of  government resources while the White House was investigating him.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Republican  congressman Tom Davis today urged that Bloch be forced to answer  questions he has long avoided about using taxpayer money to erase his  government computer. &quot;Democrats weren&#8217;t all that crazy about Scott Bloch  &hellip; but when he trained his sights on the Bush administration, they were  all too willing to let him slide,&quot; Davis said in a statement.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Computers  and documents were seized in two raids yesterday on OSC headquarters  and Bloch&#8217;s suburban Virginia home. Bloch was not arrested or charged  with a crime, and an OSC spokesman told the Associated Press he knew of  no motive for the raids. Bloch admitted to paying Geeks on Call, a  technology company, $1,150 to wipe his computer clean in 2006, which he  claimed was necessary to protect personal information. <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">He is also accused of neglecting whistleblower complaints that crossed his desk&#8230;.<\/div>\n<\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\"><font color=\"#400040\"><strong>Republicans call for testimony? Republicans?<\/strong><\/font>  This is becoming very confusing. When he opened an investigation of  Rove, Democrats groaned because of his reputation as someone who seemed  to be trying to shut down his own Agency &#8211; tasked with protecting  whistle blowers. So now, he apparently was instrumental in getting  Lurita Doan, Miss Republican Operator Obnoxious Person of 2007, fired.  Now the <font color=\"#400040\"><strong>Republicans<\/strong><\/font> are after him!<\/div>\n<p>         <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">Help! American government has been taken over by aliens from outer space. <font color=\"#400040\"><strong>Send help! <br \/>         <\/strong><\/font><\/div>\n<p><\/sup><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I ran across this piece about Scott Bloch today, a familiar name from the Bush era. It&#8217;s not such an important story &#8211; just wrangling about his sentence. But it reminds me how crazy things were during the Bush years. He was a Republican operative in charge of the whistle-blower protection office whose job it [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4663\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}