{"id":50215,"date":"2014-09-25T13:10:05","date_gmt":"2014-09-25T17:10:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=50215"},"modified":"2014-09-25T13:10:05","modified_gmt":"2014-09-25T17:10:05","slug":"private-coziness","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2014\/09\/25\/private-coziness\/","title":{"rendered":"private coziness&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.wsj.com\/pharmalot\/2014\/09\/24\/smoke-this-pfizer-wants-serious-warnings-removed-from-chantix\/\" target=\"_blank\">Smoke This: Pfizer Wants Serious Warnings Removed From Chantix<\/a><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><strong><font color=\"#004400\">Pharmalot: WSJ<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\">By Ed Silverman<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"small\">September 24, 2014<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">In a boost to Pfizer,  the FDA has updated labeling on its Chantix smoking-cessation pill to  indicate the drug may not carry the risks of suicidal behavior, a  controversial issue that prompted the agency to include a serious warning in the labeling in 2009. The changes are being made to reflect the results of various studies. One study involved a so-called meta-analysis of five studies  involving nearly 2,000 patients that Pfizer says did not show an  increase in suicide thoughts or actions among people who took Chantix  compared with a placebo.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The drug maker also pointed to four observational studies of between  10,000 and 30,000 people that did not find differences in risk between  Chantix and other nicotine treatments, although these had several  limitations [most of the label changes appear on <a href=\"http:\/\/www.accessdata.fda.gov\/drugsatfda_docs\/label\/2014\/021928s032s036s038lbl.pdf\">page 3<\/a>]. The labeling change  is welcome news for Pfizer, which hoped Chantix would become a  blockbuster but has instead encountered a marketing challenge. Shortly  after Chantix was approved in 2006, the drug was increasingly linked in  news reports of acts of violence or suicide. The FDA issued successive alerts, the Federal Aviation Administration  banned usage by pilots and air traffic controllers, and the Departments  of Defense and Transportation restricted use in sensitive occupations.  Meanwhile, Chantix sales slid to $648 million last year from $846  million in 2008. And Pfizer settled hundreds of lawsuits last year by  people who claim Chantix caused them harm.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The labeling change, by the way, was made on September 19, but Pfizer  had not publicly discussed the changes until today, when a watchdog  group called the Institute for Safe Medicine Practices planned to  release an analysis&nbsp;placing  Chantix in an unflattering light and calling for the Black Box warning  to be strengthened. The timing of the disclosure of the labeling change  suggests that Pfizer sought to mitigate any negative publicity that may  have ensued&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Pfizer would like the serious warning, which is known as a Black Box in regulatory parlance, removed, the Associated Press  writes. A Pfizer spokesman writes us that the labeling change and  upcoming meeting &ldquo;both serve as a step forward in the process of  accurately communicating the clinical and observational data&rdquo; in  relation to serious side effects referenced in the warnings section of  the labeling.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">Even though the Black Box remains unchanged, Pfizer may benefit to  some degree, anyway. How so? The updated labeling now includes new  information about the studies in the Warnings &amp; Precaution section.  As a practical matter, the Black Box is still front and center, but new  language may soften the blow, at least if enough physicians interpret  the new information as Pfizer would like. We asked the FDA if the Black  Box may be removed and will update you with any reply.<\/div>\n<ul>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong>[<font color=\"#200020\">UPDATE:<\/font><\/strong> Thomas Moore, a senior scientist at ISMP,  contends the labeling may not help Pfizer very much. &quot;The new studies  added to the label provide little new insight into the psychiatric side  effects of Chantix.&nbsp;The meta-analysis of suicidal behaviors included  only a few of the many clinical studies, was much too small to detect  these rare but catastrophic events, and was not published or peer  reviewed.&nbsp;&nbsp;The observational studies had even more limitations.&nbsp;Neither  the observational studies nor the meta analysis included the full range  of psychiatric side effects reported.&quot;<strong>]<\/strong><\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Meanwhile, ISMP reviewed side effect reports filed with FDA and found  that Chantix accounted for more cases of suicide, self-injury or  homicidal thoughts than any other therapeutic drug between 2007 and the  third quarter of 2013. Moreover, Chantix ranked first in both suicidal  and self-injurious thoughts as well as homicidal thoughts, and these  reports outnumbered those for any other drug by more than three times. Moore says there is still more evidence that Chantix causes  psychiatric side effects. And so the watchdog group plans to ask the FDA  to further strengthen the Black Box warning and widen the restrictions  on Chantix use to still other occupations. He declined to name those  occupations&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">There were limitations on some Pfizer findings, as well. The  observational studies were conducted after widespread publicity about  Chantix and suicidal or hostile behavior, which means patients with a  history of psychiatric illness may have been prescribed an alternative  treatment. And only reports that resulted in hospitalizations were  included, suggesting other incidents were not noted.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\"><strong>[<font color=\"#200020\">UPDATE<\/font>:<\/strong> ISMP&#8217;s  Moore writes us that &quot;the study of psychiatric hospitalizations omitted  85% of the known psychiatric side effects and depended on diagnostic  codes that had not been studied or validated.&quot;<strong>]<\/strong><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">[EDITOR&#8217;S NOTE: An earlier version of this story indicated all the observational studies were conducted by Pfizer].<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/ul>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"200\" vspace=\"4\" hspace=\"4\" border=\"0\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/tycoon2.gif\" \/> I declare ongoing resentments against Pfizer on any number of grounds: the way Zoloft&reg; was approved by the FDA was insider trading [see [<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/02\/18\/zoloft-the-approval-iii\/\">zoloft: the approval III&hellip;<\/a>]; their shameful clinical trial of Zoloft&reg; in adolescents [Wagner et al][see <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2011\/07\/22\/tuning-the-quartet\/\">tuning the quartet&hellip;<\/a>]; financing Robert Gibbons&#8217; recurrent attacks on the various Black Box Warnings [see <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/09\/19\/very-monotonous\/\">very monotonous&hellip;<\/a>]; promoting Gabapentin [Neurontin&reg;] as a pain medication [<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.boston.com\/news\/local\/articles\/2008\/10\/08\/e_mails_suggest_pfizer_tried_to_suppress_study_on_drug\/\">E-mails suggest Pfizer tried to suppress study on drug<\/a>]; but mostly for their ads that put the phrase &quot;<em><strong><font color=\"#200020\">chemical imbalance<\/font><\/strong><\/em>&quot; into the public register.<\/div>\n<p align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"250\" height=\"120\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/zoloft-1.gif\" \/><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">Pfizer has run into black box warnings with all three drugs [Zoloft&reg;, Neurontin&reg;, and Chantix&reg;] and spent a mint trying to counter them [<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/09\/19\/very-monotonous\/\">very monotonous&hellip;<\/a>,&nbsp;<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/12\/08\/way-past-time-2\/\">way past time&hellip;<\/a>]. They seem to feel <em>picked on<\/em> to have 3\/3 drugs under warning. Another more reasonable interpretation is that they aren&#8217;t very good at looking at their data or are given to sleight of hand in reporting. All of the studies are industry funded and are based on population studies. But the part that has me writing is that they seem to have a habit of operating privately with the FDA. They sure did that getting approval for Zoloft&reg; in the first place [<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/02\/18\/zoloft-the-approval-iii\/\">zoloft: the approval III&hellip;<\/a>]. Now, here they go again with Chantix&reg;:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">The labeling change, by the way, was made on September 19, <strong><font color=\"#990000\">but Pfizer   had not publicly discussed the changes until today<\/font><\/strong>, when a watchdog   group called the Institute for Safe Medicine Practices planned to   release an analysis&nbsp;placing  Chantix in an unflattering light and  calling for the Black Box warning  to be strengthened. The timing of the  disclosure of the labeling change  suggests that Pfizer sought to  mitigate any negative publicity that may  have ensued&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">Private coziness with the FDA just isn&#8217;t going to do, even if they do bring in <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/List_of_pharmaceutical_companies\">$50 B\/year<\/a>. And for what it&#8217;s worth, my anecdotal experience with Chantix&reg; has been negative &#8211; no successes and complaints about agitation in most cases. I decided to stop prescribing it fairly early.&nbsp;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Smoke This: Pfizer Wants Serious Warnings Removed From Chantix Pharmalot: WSJ By Ed Silverman September 24, 2014 In a boost to Pfizer, the FDA has updated labeling on its Chantix smoking-cessation pill to indicate the drug may not carry the risks of suicidal behavior, a controversial issue that prompted the agency to include a serious [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50215","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50215","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50215"}],"version-history":[{"count":28,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50215\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50243,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50215\/revisions\/50243"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50215"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50215"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50215"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}