{"id":51750,"date":"2014-11-26T09:00:12","date_gmt":"2014-11-26T14:00:12","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=51750"},"modified":"2014-11-26T09:52:35","modified_gmt":"2014-11-26T14:52:35","slug":"ombudding","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2014\/11\/26\/ombudding\/","title":{"rendered":"ombudding&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">European ombudsman questions European Medicines Agency over AbbVie redactions<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"small\">by Rory Watson<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\"><strong><font color=\"#0033ff\">British Medical Journal.<\/font><\/strong> 2014 349:g6904.<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">The  European ombudsman, Emily O&rsquo;Reilly, has written to the European  Medicines Agency asking it to explain by 31 January 2015 the redactions  it made in the clinical trial data provided by AbbVie for its best  selling drug adalimumab [Humira], used to treat rheumatoid arthritis. The redactions were made as part of the settlement between the agency  and the company after AbbVie had gone to court to try to prevent  publication of certain clinical trial data.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">In her letter  O&rsquo;Reilly acknowledged that &ldquo;certain redactions may be justified to  protect the personal data of patients.&rdquo; She also accepted that &ldquo;certain  other redactions, which mention the names of companies that provided  services to AbbVie, or the names of software used by AbbVie, are not, in  my view, problematic, as they may be considered to relate to the  confidential business relationships of AbbVie.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">But after  examining the original and the redacted versions of the clinical trial  data, internal agency communications, and correspondence between the  agency and the company, she expressed &ldquo;doubts and concerns as regards  other redactions.&rdquo; O&rsquo;Reilly, who opened an investigation into the case  in April, identified 16 instances where she wanted the agency to explain  why the redactions were necessary to protect AbbVie&rsquo;s legitimate  commercial interests&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">I&#8217;m impressed with the position of <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ombudsman.europa.eu\/home.faces\">European Ombudsman<\/a>. She apparently has the necessary power to open investigation of just about anything. This AbbVie suit and settlement is the one that got the whole EMA Data Transparency trajectory off-track. Ombudsman Emily O&#8217;Reilly goes on to question redactions that don&#8217;t seem to relate directly to either Patient Confidentiality or to Commercially Confidential Information. Kudos for her promptness in acting and the specific nature of her complaints. It&#8217;s only through speedy and focused investigations of this sort&nbsp; that we will make genuine progress in cleaning up the Clinical Trial process. We could use a US equivalent, an American Ombidsman, doing the same things here. <\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>European ombudsman questions European Medicines Agency over AbbVie redactions by Rory Watson British Medical Journal. 2014 349:g6904. The European ombudsman, Emily O&rsquo;Reilly, has written to the European Medicines Agency asking it to explain by 31 January 2015 the redactions it made in the clinical trial data provided by AbbVie for its best selling drug adalimumab [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_topic_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_reply_count_hidden":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51750","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51750","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51750"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51750\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":51757,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51750\/revisions\/51757"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51750"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51750"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51750"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}