{"id":58489,"date":"2015-07-22T21:54:31","date_gmt":"2015-07-23T01:54:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=58489"},"modified":"2015-07-22T22:19:43","modified_gmt":"2015-07-23T02:19:43","slug":"still-around","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2015\/07\/22\/still-around\/","title":{"rendered":"still around&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><a href=\"http:\/\/mobile.nytimes.com\/2015\/07\/19\/opinion\/psychiatrys-identity-crisis.html?_r=1&#038;referrer=\" target=\"_blank\">Psychiatry&rsquo;s Identity Crisis<\/a><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><strong><font color=\"#000001\">New York Times<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\">by Richard A. Friedman<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\">Contributing Op-Ed Writer<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"small\">July 17, 2015<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">AMERICAN  psychiatry is facing a quandary: Despite a vast investment in basic  neuroscience research and its rich intellectual promise, we have little  to show for it on the treatment front. With  few exceptions, every major class of current psychotropic drugs &mdash;  antidepressants, antipsychotics, anti-anxiety medications &mdash; basically  targets the same receptors and neurotransmitters in the brain as did  their precursors, which were developed in the 1950s and 1960s. Sure, the newer drugs are generally safer and more tolerable than the older ones, but they are no more effective&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">At the same time,  judging from research funding priorities, it seems that leaders in my  field are turning their backs on psychotherapy and psychotherapy  research. In 2015, 10 percent of the overall National Institute of  Mental Health research funding has been allocated to clinical trials  research, of which slightly more than half &mdash; a mere 5.4 percent of the  whole research allotment &mdash; goes to psychotherapy clinical trials  research.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">As a psychiatrist and  psychopharmacologist who loves neuroscience, I find this trend very  disturbing. First, psychotherapy has been shown in scores of  well-controlled clinical trials to be as effective as psychotropic  medication for very common psychiatric illnesses like major depression  and anxiety disorders; second, a majority of Americans clearly prefer  psychotherapy to taking medication&#8230;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">Finally,  many of our patients have histories of trauma, sexual abuse, the stress  of poverty or deprivation. There is obviously no quick biological fix  for these complex problems. Still, there has  been a steady decline in the number of Americans receiving psychotherapy  along with a concomitant increase in the use of psychotropic medication  in those who are treated in the outpatient setting. These trends are  most likely driven by many factors, including cost and the limited  availability that most Americans have to mental health practitioners. It  is clearly cheaper and faster to give a pill than deliver  psychotherapy&#8230;<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">More fundamentally, the fact that all  feelings, thoughts and behavior require brain activity to happen does  not mean that the only or best way to change &mdash; or understand &mdash; them is  with medicine. We know, for instance, that not all psychiatric disorders  can be adequately treated with biological therapy. Personality  disorders, like borderline and narcissistic personality disorders, which  are common and can cause impairment and suffering comparable to that of  severe depression, are generally poorly responsive to psychotropic  drugs, but are very treatable with various types of psychotherapy&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">A couple of months ago, I had me something of a rant. It was long overdue for me:<\/div>\n<ul><span class=\"small\">     <\/p>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2015\/05\/03\/guilding-the-lilly\/\">guilding the lily&hellip; <\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2015\/05\/05\/in-a-guilded-cage\/\">in a guilded cage&hellip;&nbsp;      <\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2015\/05\/05\/the-guilded-age\/\">the guilded age&hellip;      <\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2015\/05\/06\/the-rise-and-of-the-guild\/\">the rise and ??? of the guild&hellip;      <\/a><\/li>\n<p>     <\/span><\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">Robert Whitaker got it started in an interview with Bruce Levine:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.truth-out.org\/news\/item\/22266-psychiatry-now-admits-its-been-wrong-in-big-ways-but-can-it-change-a-conversation-with-investigative-reporter-robert-whitaker\">Psychiatry Now Admits It&rsquo;s Been Wrong in Big Ways &ndash; But Can It Change? <\/a><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><strong><font color=\"#000001\">Truthout<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\">by Bruce Levine<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"small\">March 5, 2014<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\"><em><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Bruce Levine&rsquo;s Question<\/font><\/strong><\/em>: <em>Is  it really possible for psychiatry to reform in any  meaningful way  given their complete embrace of the &quot;medical model of  mental illness,&quot;  their idea that emotional and behavioral problems are  caused by a  bio-chemical defect of some type? Can they really reform  when their  profession as a financial enterprise rests on drug  prescribing,  electroshock and other bio-chemical-electrical treatments?  Can  psychiatry do anything but pay lip service to a more   holistic\/integrative view that includes psychological, spiritual,   social, cultural and political realities?<\/em><\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><em><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Robert Whitaker&rsquo;s Answer<\/font><\/strong><\/em>:  I think we have to appreciate this fact: any medical specialty has   guild interests, meaning that it needs to protect the market value of   its treatments. If it is going to abandon one form of treatment, it   needs to be able to replace it with another. It can&rsquo;t change if there is   no replacement in the offing. <strong><font color=\"#990000\">When the APA published DSM-III, it basically ceded talk therapy to  psychologists, counselors, social workers and so forth&#8230;<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">    It&#8217;s not Bob&#8217;s fault. He didn&#8217;t mean to set me off. He didn&#8217;t know that there were a lot of psychiatrists who didn&#8217;t sign the mythic <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Talk Therapy Cession Decree of 1980<\/font><\/strong>, who didn&#8217;t sign up for the <em><strong><font color=\"#990000\">&#8216;complete embrace of the &quot;medical model of  mental illness,&quot;  their idea that emotional and behavioral problems are  caused by a  bio-chemical defect of some type&#8217;<\/font><\/strong>,<\/em> and who had reluctantly left our academic positions, and just continued doing the psychotherapy we had learned to do. And he didn&#8217;t know we didn&#8217;t need any advice about how to repurpose ourselves [because we didn&#8217;t repurpose ourselves back in 1980]. Said <a href=\"http:\/\/www.truth-out.org\/news\/item\/22266-psychiatry-now-admits-its-been-wrong-in-big-ways-but-can-it-change-a-conversation-with-investigative-reporter-robert-whitaker\" target=\"_blank\">Robert Whitaker<\/a>:    <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">&hellip; So I don&rsquo;t believe it will be  possible for psychiatry to  change unless it identifies a new function  that would be marketable, so  to speak. Psychiatry needs to identify a  change that would be consistent  with its interests as a guild. The one  faint possibility I see &ndash; and this may seem counterintuitive &ndash;  is for  psychiatry to become the profession that provides a critical  view of  psychiatric drugs. Family doctors do most of the prescribing of   psychiatric drugs today, without any real sense of their risks and   benefits, and so psychiatrists could stake out a role as being the   experts who know how to use the drugs in a very selective, cautious   manner, and the experts who know how to incorporate such drug treatment   into a holistic, integrated form of care. If the public sees the drugs   as quite problematic, as medications that can serve a purpose &ndash; but  only  if prescribed in a very nuanced way &ndash; then it will want to turn to   physicians who understand well the problems with the drugs and their   limitations. That is what I think must happen for psychiatry to change.  Psychiatry  must see a financial benefit from a proposed change, one  consistent  with guild interests.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">No thanks. Life without a guild is preferable. Of course there wasn&#8217;t really any  <strong><font color=\"#200020\">Talk Therapy Cession Decree of 1980<\/font><\/strong>. I was just being sarcastic. But that dichotomy actually did arise in those days &#8211; the psychotherapy versus the medical model thinking Levine is talking about. Pick one or the other [how about both? or maybe the right one for the patient at hand?]. Jeffrey Lieberman just wrote a book about the horrors of the pre-1980 psychiatry he saved you from &#8211; caricaturizing psychiatrists as Freud Clones who had left real medicine for a fairy tale world, charlatans all. And a million times I&#8217;ve heard that an interest in psychotherapy doesn&#8217;t require a medical education &#8211; a wasted four years. But actually, I can&#8217;t personally imagine any better preparation than spending one&#8217;s life amid and among the suffering people that physicians attend daily. That&#8217;s what got me interested in the first place and where I learned much of what I know. And I certainly didn&#8217;t shed my medical identity, or for that matter my psychiatric identity. I prescribe medications when I think they are appropriate and might help. <\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">But I&#8217;ll stop my rant. This blog isn&#8217;t about that old story. This blog is about honesty in science. But I guess it has been so long since someone acknowledged that psychiatrists are physicians who care for the sick, bringing to bear whatever might help &#8211; whether biologic, psychologic, sociologic, humanistic, cybernetic, etc. And that for many of our patients, psychotherapy of the kind I learned, practiced, and still practice is exactly what the doctor ordered. As for Whitaker&#8217;s thoughts about searching for a marketable skill or some new function. I guess I already have one, so I don&#8217;t need to ponder a Collaborative Care environment where I&#8217;m asked to be an expert consultant medicating patients I&#8217;ve never seen [which to me smells like malpractice].<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">What I came to say is that I appreciate Dr. Friedman noticing that we&#8217;re still around and that what we do fills an important need in the cosmos of care of the sick&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Psychiatry&rsquo;s Identity Crisis New York Times by Richard A. Friedman Contributing Op-Ed Writer July 17, 2015 AMERICAN psychiatry is facing a quandary: Despite a vast investment in basic neuroscience research and its rich intellectual promise, we have little to show for it on the treatment front. With few exceptions, every major class of current psychotropic [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58489","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58489","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58489"}],"version-history":[{"count":17,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58489\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58507,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58489\/revisions\/58507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58489"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58489"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58489"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}