{"id":60732,"date":"2015-10-17T18:30:13","date_gmt":"2015-10-17T22:30:13","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=60732"},"modified":"2015-10-17T18:34:22","modified_gmt":"2015-10-17T22:34:22","slug":"a-ruse","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2015\/10\/17\/a-ruse\/","title":{"rendered":"a ruse&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<br \/>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><a href=\"http:\/\/psychnews.psychiatryonline.org\/doi\/full\/10.1176\/appi.pn.2015.10a13\" target=\"_blank\">APA Urges Creation of Payment Codes Specific to Collaborative Care Model<\/a><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><strong><font color=\"#000001\">Psychiatric<\/font><font color=\"#990000\">News<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\">by Mark Moran<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"small\">September 24, 2015<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">Separate  codes should be created for the care-management and  psychiatric-consultation components of the collaborative care model. Appropriate  payment codes need to be developed to reflect the work of  physicians &mdash; including psychiatrists &mdash; participating in collaborative care  models treating patients with mental illness in primary care settings,  said APA CEO and Medical Director Saul Levin, M.D., M.P.A., in a letter  last month to the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.  <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">The  18-page letter was in response to CMS&rsquo;s Proposed Rule for Medicare  Program; Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule  and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2016. <strong><font color=\"#200020\">The letter addresses a range  of issues raised in the proposed rule &mdash; including improving payment  accuracy for primary care and care management services, chronic care  management and transitional care management services, the Physician  Quality Reporting System, electronic health records, and the Medicare  Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act. But the bulk of APA&rsquo;s  comments in Levin&rsquo;s letter focused on payment and coding issues around  reimbursement for the collaborative care model [CoCM]. The model,  developed by leaders in integrated care at the University of Washington,  involves a primary care physician, a care manager, and a psychiatric  consultant.<\/font><\/strong> <\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">&ldquo;The lack of reimbursement for key components of this  model has been the principal barrier to its widespread implementation,&rdquo;  Levin stated. &ldquo;Although there may be other treatment models that engage  primary care clinicians and behavioral health specialists, the specific  Collaborative Care Model [referenced in the proposed rule] is the only  model that has compelling scientific data supporting its effectiveness.  Over 80 randomized, controlled trials have shown the CoCM to be more  effective than care as usual. &hellip; In addition to the robust research  evidence for the value of collaborative care, there is also substantial  practice experience with this model of care from the Medicaid-funded  Mental Health Integration Program in Washington State, the commercially  funded DIAMOND program in Minnesota, and similar programs in several  other states.&rdquo;<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">The letter continued, &ldquo;[T]he development of codes  and requirements to be used for collaborative care for behavioral health  conditions must be specific to the CoCM to enable its clinical approach  and processes. To create codes that would facilitate any or all of the  clinical roles or transactions embedded in the model [such as  co-location of a care manager and screening mechanisms] without being  tied to the other elements of the model [such as measurement-based care  maintained in a registry with psychiatrist oversight] will not realize  the substantiated results of the model&rsquo;s utilization: that is, better  quality patient care and outcomes and cost efficiencies&rdquo;&#8230;<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p align=\"center\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/integrative-1.gif\" \/><\/p>\n<p align=\"center\" class=\"small\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/aims.uw.edu.\/collaborative-care\/team-structure\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"500\" height=\"386\" border=\"1\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/collaborative-1.jpg\" \/><\/a><br \/>  <sup>[click image for description]<\/sup><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">It remains hard for me imagine that anyone takes Collaborative Care as it is being presented seriously or would willingly participate. It begins [top version] with a Primary Care Provider who sees the patient and &quot;<em><font color=\"#200020\">Makes initial diagnosis and prescribes medication.<\/font><\/em>&quot; So right out of the gate, the model is based on the premise that <em><font color=\"#200020\">a symptomatic diagnosis of mental illness should lead to a medication prescription<\/font><\/em>. The patient then gives symptom updates&nbsp; to the Primary Care Provider and the Case Manager. At some point, the Case Manager discusses the patient&#8217;s progress with the Psychiatrist, and the Psychiatrist makes treatment [<em><font color=\"#200020\">medications<\/font><\/em>] recommendations. In the second version, there are provisions for the Psychiatrist or other Behavioral Health Clinicians to have <em><font color=\"#200020\">infrequent interactions<\/font><\/em> with the patient.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">We&#8217;re further down that yellow brick road than we used to be.&nbsp; We know that none of the current psychiatric drugs are benign and that their efficacy is nowhere near what has been widely advertised. We also know that these medications are grossly over-prescribed and many, if not all, can have a withdrawal syndrome that can be problematic. The majority of people who come to a clinic complaining of psychiatric symptoms have some problem in their life, and could benefit from a talk with someone who understands people [I work in such a clinic, and I&#8217;m impressed that one can get a lot done even with short and infrequent visits].<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">Insofar as I can see, the Collaborative Care model pushes the ubiquitous use of psych meds and isolates the patient from contact with anyone remotely trained to deal with mental illness. The Psychiatrist is only in the loop to:<\/div>\n<ul><span class=\"small\"><\/p>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\">keep the Primary Care Provider from using the medications as badly as they are currently being used<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<li>\n<div align=\"justify\">certify that the patient is receiving psychiatric care<\/div>\n<\/li>\n<p><\/span><\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">So it&#8217;s simply a ruse. In the beginning, Managed Care approached mental illness to stop people from charging insurance for psychotherapy. There was a lot of abuse and the checks put in place were justified. But now they want us to collude with the notion that this model is actually adequate, and it&#8217;s not. One wonders why the American Psychiatric Association is involved. The only reason I can think of is that they&#8217;ve been told that if they don&#8217;t go along with it, they&#8217;ll withdraw mental health coverage altogether. Whatever the back story is, this is form without substance and hardly something APA CEO and Medical Director Saul Levin, M.D., M.P.A. needs to involve himself with&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>APA Urges Creation of Payment Codes Specific to Collaborative Care Model PsychiatricNews by Mark Moran September 24, 2015 Separate codes should be created for the care-management and psychiatric-consultation components of the collaborative care model. Appropriate payment codes need to be developed to reflect the work of physicians &mdash; including psychiatrists &mdash; participating in collaborative care [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60732","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60732","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60732"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60732\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60747,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60732\/revisions\/60747"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60732"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60732"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60732"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}