{"id":63356,"date":"2016-02-07T12:24:28","date_gmt":"2016-02-07T17:24:28","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=63356"},"modified":"2016-02-10T12:51:17","modified_gmt":"2016-02-10T17:51:17","slug":"the-human-interface","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2016\/02\/07\/the-human-interface\/","title":{"rendered":"the human interface&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">I was sitting in the waiting room Friday morning waiting for an ENT appointment [to check a worrisome non-healing lesion in my nostril]. The big tv was looping through an animated description of some balloon thing they could do to your sinuses and a hearing aid spiel about why getting them from an ENT is better than [anywhere else]. I was reading on my phone about depression screening rather than from the various WebMD magazine-lets lying around. When the receptionist gave me the papers to fill out, I half expected there to be a PHQ-9 like at my internist&#8217;s office or in the waiting room at the clinic where I work. There wasn&#8217;t. But there was one about whether I needed that sinus balloon job and one in case I&#8217;m hard of hearing. When I went to the examining room, another tv set was silently mime-ing how to use an epi-pen and cycling through the various hearing aid batteries available at the front desk. The highlight of the visit was the pronouncement that it looked like &quot;a wart&quot; instead of all the ominous options that occurred to me when I found it. I gladly left my &quot;wart&quot; in a jar for the pathologist. On the way home, I wondered why I have such a strong visceral reaction against the idea of screening for depression in doctor&#8217;s waiting rooms. Here are some words:          <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"big\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/jama.jamanetwork.com\/article.aspx?articleid=2484345\">Screening for Depression in Adults:<\/a><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement<\/font><\/strong><\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\">by Albert L.&nbsp;Siu,&nbsp;MD, MSPH and the US Preventive Services Task Force [USPSTF]<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\"><strong><font color=\"#990000\">JAMA<\/font><\/strong>. 2016 315[4]:380-387.<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\" class=\"middle\">[<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/jama.jamanetwork.com\/article.aspx?articleid=2484345\">full text online<\/a>]<\/div>\n<p>         <\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Description:<\/font><\/strong> Update of the 2009 US Preventive Services Task Force [USPSTF] recommendation on screening for depression in adults.<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Methods:<\/font><\/strong> The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of  screening for depression in adult populations, including older adults  and pregnant and postpartum women; the accuracy of depression screening  instruments; and the benefits and harms of depression treatment in these  populations.<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Population:<\/font><\/strong> This recommendation applies to adults 18 years and older. <\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\"><strong><font color=\"#200020\">Recommendation:<\/font><\/strong> The USPSTF recommends screening for depression in the general  adult population, including pregnant and postpartum women. Screening  should be implemented with adequate systems in place to ensure accurate  diagnosis, effective treatment, and appropriate follow-up. [B  recommendation] <\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<ul><sup>       <\/p>\n<li><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/archinte.jamanetwork.com\/article.aspx?articleid=2484471\">Screening for Depression&mdash;A Tale of Two Questions<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/wp-admin\/US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement on Screening for Depression in AdultsNot Good Enough\">US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement on Screening for Depression in Adults<span class=\"subTitle\"> Not Good Enough<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<li><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/jama.jamanetwork.com\/article.aspx?articleid=2484316\">Recommendations for Screening for Depression in Adults<\/a> Michael Thase [full text]<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/jama.jamanetwork.com\/article.aspx?articleid=2484316\"><br \/>      <\/a><\/li>\n<li><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/patient.info\/doctor\/patient-health-questionnaire-phq-9\">Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.modernhealthcare.com\/article\/20160126\/NEWS\/160129909\/task-force-urges-depression-screening-for-all-u-s-adults?utm_campaign=KHN:%20Daily%20Health%20Policy%20Report&#038;utm_source=hs_email&#038;utm_medium=email&#038;utm_content=25649815&#038;_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_9WjnCMdJSAjB-QUDubFtNkmro9eai51htXWzPZA-omdzoZTZc_YY1BNV01Zov7hXiCZTShSeRBV0uoMuBMvHkSDVoFxZmqXNYlcfw8lCz1tJ8Org&#038;_hsmi=25649815\">Task force urges depression screening for all U.S. adults<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.medpagetoday.com\/Psychiatry\/Depression\/55848?xid=nl_mpt_DHE_2016-01-27&#038;eun=g961287d0r\">Universal Depression Screening Urged<\/a><\/li>\n<li><a href=\"http:\/\/www.healthnewsreview.org\/2016\/02\/missing-in-action-did-us-journalists-miss-a-huge-opportunity-to-critically-examine-mental-health-screening\/\" target=\"_blank\">Missing in action: Did US journalists miss a huge opportunity to critically examine mental health screening?<\/a><\/li>\n<p>       <\/sup><\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">Antidepressant use itself is already a public health problem &#8211; 11% of adult Americans are taking them. We didn&#8217;t get here because they&#8217;re so effective or benign. We were lead by deceitful trial reporting, advertising, marketing, and some shaky epidemiology.    <\/div>\n<p align=\"center\" class=\"small\"><a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.techinsider.io\/countries-largest-antidepressant-drug-users-2016-2\"><img decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" border=\"0\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/ad-use.gif\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">Besides antidepressants, they&#8217;re talking about Cognitive Behavior Therapy. CBT is a legitimate and effective therapy, but it&#8217;s not generic. In my area, most mental health types would list it as their first line discipline. But I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve seen a full course of what Aaron Beck would call CBT in the eight years I&#8217;ve been involved. What happens in formal trials and what happens in the &quot;natural world&quot; are very different things. So I suspect that the majority of waiting room depression would be treated with medication.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">And then there&#8217;s the question of what constitutes <em><font color=\"#200020\">depression<\/font><\/em>. Would it be people who say they&#8217;re depressed? &#8211; which is what unhappy people nowadays say to describe how they feel &#8211; bad marriages, no marriages, the burden of a difficult biography, personality disorders, situational crises, grief, lonliness, etc. The formal diagnosis of <em><font color=\"#200020\">depression<\/font><\/em> has become corrupted in the recent era &#8211; simplified to mean almost any constellation of discrete symptoms and causes. So even discussing it as if it&#8217;s a unitary entity is hard to justify.<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">But I don&#8217;t think those things are why depression screening evokes such a visceral &quot;No&quot; when I hear it. One part of that is the <em><font color=\"#200020\">global burden of depression<\/font><\/em> meme that introduces so many articles on antidepressants [and blogs by our former NIMH Director for one] implying that through some <em><font color=\"#200020\">not-so-clear-mechanism<\/font><\/em>, the incidence of <em><font color=\"#200020\">depression-the-vaguely-biological-entity<\/font><\/em> is accelerating. It makes&nbsp; little sense. If there were a genetic or neural circuit etiology, why would it be increasing? And were that true, what does the symptomatic treatment with medications have to with that? Those arguments invariably precede a pitch for more funding for brain research or some new, innovative, treatment for depression, loosely based on a 2004 population study by the World Health Organization. And so this whole line of thinking seems flawed to me, a cascade of unproven and unexamined assumptions that have achieved an autonomous momentum that will only be amplified by <font color=\"#200020\">waiting-room-depression-screening<\/font>.<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">And the other related visceral thing for me is that this way of thinking simplifies and reduces the infinite variance of human suffering. Depression is an expressive and communicative human emotion &#8211; obvious with little more that brief look. The idea that one can practice decent medicine and need a questionnaire to identify it and inquire about it says something about the system of practice envisioned by a world of people who don&#8217;t understand what &quot;<em><font color=\"#200020\">practice decent medicine<\/font><\/em>&quot; means. The PHQ-9 questions aren&#8217;t about subtle things:<\/div>\n<ul><sup>   <\/p>\n<li><font color=\"#200020\">Little interest or pleasure in doing things?<\/font><\/li>\n<li><font color=\"#200020\">Feeling down, depressed, or hopeless?<\/font><\/li>\n<li><font color=\"#200020\">Trouble falling or staying asleep, or sleeping too much?<\/font><\/li>\n<li><font color=\"#200020\">Feeling tired or having little energy?<\/font><\/li>\n<li><font color=\"#200020\">Poor appetite or overeating?<\/font><\/li>\n<li><font color=\"#200020\">Feeling bad about yourself &#8211; or that you are a failure or have let yourself or your family down?<\/font><\/li>\n<li><font color=\"#200020\">Trouble concentrating on things, such as reading the newspaper or watching television?<\/font><\/li>\n<li><font color=\"#200020\">Moving or speaking so slowly that other people could have noticed?<\/font><\/li>\n<li><font color=\"#200020\">Or being so fidgety or restless that you have been moving around a lot more than usual?<\/font><\/li>\n<li><font color=\"#200020\">Thoughts that you would be better off dead, or of hurting yourself in some way?<\/font><\/li>\n<p>   <\/sup><\/ul>\n<div align=\"justify\" class=\"small\">I&#8217;m aware that this second thing may say more about what I think of modern medicine with its emphasis on work product, cost containment, objectification, uniformity, and guidelines than it has to do with screening for depression. I just know that depressed people feel alone and unseen. I think if a doctor pointed at my PHQ-9 and said, &quot;I see here that you&#8217;re depressed,&quot; I&#8217;d feel even more unseen. If on the other hand, she looked me in the eye and said &quot;I can see that you&#8217;re really depressed&quot; and asked &quot;What&#8217;s going on?&quot; I&#8217;d feel seen and maybe not so alone. Screening is generally designed to &quot;pick up&quot; things that don&#8217;t show &#8211; a  pap smear, a blood count, a fasting blood glucose, an EKG, a serologic  test for Syphilis, a questionnaire about past medical history or a  review of systems. Depression shows. And I see screening for depression  as interpersonal, part of the human interface.<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I was sitting in the waiting room Friday morning waiting for an ENT appointment [to check a worrisome non-healing lesion in my nostril]. The big tv was looping through an animated description of some balloon thing they could do to your sinuses and a hearing aid spiel about why getting them from an ENT is [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-63356","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63356","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=63356"}],"version-history":[{"count":20,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63356\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":63399,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/63356\/revisions\/63399"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=63356"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=63356"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=63356"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}