{"id":69800,"date":"2017-01-02T08:00:04","date_gmt":"2017-01-02T13:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=69800"},"modified":"2017-01-02T13:12:07","modified_gmt":"2017-01-02T18:12:07","slug":"big-thing-small-package","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/02\/big-thing-small-package\/","title":{"rendered":"big thing, <sub>small package<\/sub>&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"small\" align=\"justify\">Sometimes big things come in small packages. This is from a research letter published last month in <strong><font color=\"#990000\">JAMA Intern Medicine<\/font><\/strong>. The author&#8217;s data comes from the <a href=\"https:\/\/meps.ahrq.gov\/data_stats\/download_data\/pufs\/h160a\/h160adoc.shtml\" target=\"_blank\">Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey MEPS HC-160A: 2013 prescribed medicines<\/a>:<\/div>\n<div align=\"right\"><sup><strong><font color=\"#200020\">hat tip to James O&#8230;&nbsp; <\/font><\/strong><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/hat-tip.gif\" height=\"35\" border=\"0\" align=\"absmiddle\" \/><\/sup><\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div class=\"big\" align=\"center\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov\/pubmed\/27942726#\" target=\"_blank\">Adult Utilization of Psychiatric Drugs and Differences by Sex, Age, and Race.<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"middle\" align=\"center\">by Moore TJ and Mattison DR<\/div>\n<div class=\"middle\" align=\"center\"><strong><font color=\"#990000\">JAMA Intern Medicine.<\/font><\/strong> Dec 12, 2016. [Epub ahead of print] <\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"small\" align=\"justify\">That report they summarized is a <em><font color=\"#200020\">bear<\/font><\/em>, but they&#8217;ve pared it down into two tables that are manageable. First, how widespread is the use of prescribed psychiatric medication [expressed as % of the population]?<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/survey-1.jpg\" width=\"350\" vspace=\"7\" height=\"275\" border=\"0\" \/><\/div>\n<div class=\"small\" align=\"justify\">Next, which drugs are being used?<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/survey-3.jpg\" width=\"349\" vspace=\"7\" height=\"282\" border=\"0\" \/><\/div>\n<div class=\"small\" align=\"justify\">If you work in a public clinic like I do, none of that will come as any great shock. The only thing that surprised me was that <font color=\"#200020\">Zoloft&reg; <\/font>and<font color=\"#200020\"> Ambien&reg;<\/font> are so high up on the list. I prescribe neither so it was just a surprise. Reasons? I had no success with <font color=\"#200020\">Zoloft&reg;<\/font> at all, and later, when I looked at the FDA approval documents, they looked beyond shaky to me [<a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/02\/17\/zoloft-the-approval-i\/\" target=\"_blank\">zoloft: the approval I&hellip;<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/02\/18\/zoloft-the-approval-ii\/\" target=\"_blank\">zoloft: the approval II&hellip;<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/02\/18\/zoloft-the-approval-iii\/\" target=\"_blank\">zoloft: the approval III&hellip;<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/02\/19\/zoloft-beyond-the-approval-i\/\" target=\"_blank\">zoloft: beyond the approval I&hellip;<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/02\/19\/zoloft-beyond-the-approval-ii\/\" target=\"_blank\">zoloft: beyond the approval II&hellip;<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2013\/02\/19\/zoloft-the-epilogue\/\" target=\"_blank\">zoloft: the epilogue&hellip;<\/a>]. <font color=\"#200020\">Ambien&reg;<\/font>? When the second patient showed up with bruises from falls while sleepwalking on <font color=\"#200020\">Ambien&reg;<\/font>, it came off of my formulary for good. But otherwise, no big surprises. However, the authors went further and took a reasonable stab at quantifying something that I&#8217;ve thought about [and struggled with] ever since I started at the clinic about 8 or 9 years ago &#8211; <strong><em><font color=\"#660033\">long term use of these medications<\/font><\/em><\/strong>. Here are a few quotes from their letter:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">&quot;Long-term use was defined as 3 or more prescriptions filled in 2013 or a prescription started in 2011 or earlier&#8230;&quot;<\/div>\n<p align=\"justify\">&quot;<strong><font color=\"#660033\">Most psychiatric drug use reported by adults was long term, with 84.3% [95% Cl, 82.9%-85.7%] having filled 3 or more prescriptions in 2013 or indicating that they had started taking the drug during 2011 or earlier.<\/font><\/strong> Differences in long-term use among the 3 drug classes were small. The long-term users filled a mean [SE] of 9.8 [0.19] prescriptions for psychiatric drugs during 2013&#8230;&quot;<\/p>\n<p align=\"justify\">&quot;These data show 1 of 6 US adults reported taking psychiatric drugs at least once during 2013, but with 2- to 3-fold differences by race\/ethnicity, age, and sex. Moreover, use may have been underestimated because prescriptions were self-reported, and our estimates of long-term use were limited to a single survey year&#8230;&quot;<\/p>\n<div align=\"justify\">&quot;<strong><font color=\"#660033\">Among adults reporting taking psychiatric drugs, more than 8 of 10 reported long-term use&#8230;<\/font><\/strong>&quot; <\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div class=\"small\" align=\"justify\">Having taken something of a 25 year long sabbatical from mainstream psychiatry after leaving academia for a private psychotherapy practice, I started volunteering in local charity clinic after I retired. I was unprepared for the psychiatry I encountered there. I expected that I&#8217;d have to bone up on my psychpharmacology [and I did], but I sure didn&#8217;t care for what I found. It seemed like over&middot;medication, poly&middot;pharmacy, inappropriate drug choices, continual use of time&middot;limited medicines, all were standard operating procedures. So I started reading the clinical trials and learned about ClinicalTrials.gov, Drugs@FDA, PubMed, and the push&middot;back &#8211; the blogs and literature that were developing around these topics [and I started this one of my own].<\/div>\n<p class=\"small\" align=\"justify\">This report by Moore and Mattison well documents what I found returning to general psychiatry. I still find the figures staggering, but the one that makes the least sense is that these medications are being taken long term. Depression, even in its mest malignant format is time limited for the most part. There&#8217;s evidence that in some depressions, maintenance medication can be a relapse preventive, but hardly in <em><font color=\"#200020\">80% of the cases<\/font><\/em>. All of this has happened in a period where psychiatry has been telling itself and the rest of the world that it&#8217;s <em><font color=\"#200020\">medicalizing<\/font><\/em>, but there&#8217;s nothing about those figures that&#8217;s <em><font color=\"#200020\">medical<\/font><\/em>. It&#8217;s contaminated by profiteering, plain and simple, and at the expense of patients who&#8217;ve come for help.<\/p>\n<div class=\"small\" align=\"justify\">I hear from patients who are caught up in a carousel&nbsp; of medications trying unsuccessfully to find something that helps but getting nowhere or even seeing their symptoms worsening:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<div class=\"small\" align=\"justify\"><em><strong><font color=\"#660033\">&quot;&#8230; insanity is doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results&quot;<\/font><\/strong><\/em><\/div>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"small\" align=\"justify\">There was a time that the best advice would be to forget what they&#8217;ve been told to date and start over, tapering any medication that isn&#8217;t clearly helping. Check out the <em><font color=\"#200020\">hardware<\/font><\/em> [a medical condition or medication that might be contributing]; likewise with the <em><font color=\"#200020\">firmware<\/font><\/em> [a major psychiatric syndrome like Melancholia or Manic Depressive Illness]; and then the <em><font color=\"#200020\">software<\/font><\/em> [find a reputable therapist to help them explore their lives, past and present, looking for the tangles]. That&#8217;s the same advice they would have gotten forty years ago. And it&#8217;s still good advice.<\/div>\n<p><\/p>\n<div class=\"small\" align=\"justify\">This coin has another side. While the figures quoted in this article telegraph the clear message that these medications have been over&middot;promoted and over&middot;prescribed, they also raise another potential concern. When we became disappointed with mental hospitals, we shut them down rather that <em><font color=\"#200020\">right-size<\/font><\/em> them. When we were disillusioned with antipsychotic medication and community care, we did the same thing [and filled our jails]. Similarly, when the various psychotherapies didn&#8217;t live up to their early promises, they were vilified. And while we currently remain in a situation where the medications on that list are over&middot;prescribed, that&#8217;s not to say that there aren&#8217;t a significant number of patients who are genuinely benefiting from taking them. Something about the: <\/div>\n<ul>\n<div class=\"small\" align=\"justify\"><em><strong><font color=\"#660033\">&quot;&#8230; baby with the bathwater&quot;<\/font><\/strong><\/em><\/div>\n<\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sometimes big things come in small packages. This is from a research letter published last month in JAMA Intern Medicine. The author&#8217;s data comes from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey MEPS HC-160A: 2013 prescribed medicines: hat tip to James O&#8230;&nbsp; Adult Utilization of Psychiatric Drugs and Differences by Sex, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-69800","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-opinion"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69800","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=69800"}],"version-history":[{"count":44,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69800\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":69844,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/69800\/revisions\/69844"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=69800"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=69800"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=69800"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}