{"id":826,"date":"2006-12-10T01:04:39","date_gmt":"2006-12-10T06:04:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/?p=826"},"modified":"2006-12-10T06:35:13","modified_gmt":"2006-12-10T11:35:13","slug":"1-petropolitics-the-business-plan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/2006\/12\/10\/1-petropolitics-the-business-plan\/","title":{"rendered":"1. petropolitics: the business plan&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div align=\"justify\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"240\" hspace=\"5\" height=\"180\" border=\"1\" align=\"right\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/oil_well_animation.gif\" \/>In his <a href=\"http:\/\/www.energybulletin.net\/559.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>1999 speech<\/strong><\/a> at the <strong>London Petroleum Institute<\/strong> in London, <strong>Dick Cheney<\/strong>, C.E.O. of <strong>Halliburton<\/strong>, spoke to the assembled oil barons about the some of the problems in oil acquisition:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">Governments and the national oil companies are obviously controlling about ninety per cent of the assets. Oil remains fundamentally a government business. While many regions of the world offer great oil opportunities, the Middle East with two thirds of the world&rsquo;s oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize ultimately lies, even though companies are anxious for greater access there, progress continues to be slow.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">The year before, in a speech at the <strong>Cato Institute<\/strong> entitled <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cato.org\/speeches\/sp-dc062398.html\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Defending Liberty in a Global Economy<\/strong><\/a> [an intriguing title], he lamented the naivety of our policymakers who he felt did not recognize the importance of American Corporations as a &quot;strategic asset&quot; and did not fully understand the world economic situation:   <\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">I think it&#8217;s important for us to look on U.S. businesses as a valuable national asset, not just as an activity we tolerate, or a practice that we do not want to get too close to because it involves money. Far better for us to understand that the drive of American firms to be involved in and shape and direct the global economy is a strategic asset that serves the national interest of the United States.<\/div>\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">One of the problems we face, I think, is that we have far too many policymakers who lack any real understanding of what the modern world economy is all about or how it actually functions. I am concerned that we have a lot of policymakers who may be wise in the ways of Washington, but are, frankly, naive about the way the world economy works. I think they tend to still view international commerce as a process by which nations trade a few agricultural commodities and some manufactured goods and that is it. They believe that commerce is easily controlled and regulated by national governments, and that, if necessary, the United States can isolate itself from the rest of the world&#8217;s economy and remain prosperous.<\/div>\n<div align=\"center\">&#8230; <\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">National boundaries simply do not mean what they used to mean economically. The vast flows of capital and technology, the internet, the tremendous growth in services moving back and forth across international borders and between centers of economic opportunity and activity around the globe, have dramatically transformed what we think of as the world&#8217;s economy. We need enlightened political leadership that understands and comprehends the complexities of the world economy. All too often these days that leadership appears to be lacking. <\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">It&#8217;s not hard to hear the music behind the words. American Oil Companies weren&#8217;t having much success dealing with some of the Middle Eastern governments &#8211; Hussein in Iraq and the Taliban in Afghanistan  to be specific.&nbsp; But there were other plans in the works. In 1997, a group of Neoconservatives including Dick Cheney formed <strong>The Project for the New American Century<\/strong>. In 1998, they wrote President Clinton <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newamericancentury.org\/iraqclintonletter.htm\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>their now famous letter<\/strong><\/a> about &quot;regime change in Iraq:<\/div>\n<blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"180\" vspace=\"5\" hspace=\"5\" height=\"135\" border=\"1\" align=\"left\" src=\"http:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/images\/oil_well_animation_2.gif\" \/>The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able            to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div align=\"justify\">We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration&#8217;s attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam&#8217;s regime from power. This will require a full complement of diplomatic, political and military efforts. Although we are fully aware of the dangers and difficulties in implementing this policy, we believe the dangers of failing to do so are far greater. We believe the U.S. has the authority under existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests in the Gulf.<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n<div align=\"justify\">It&#8217;s easy to see how Cheney&#8217;s plan was being shaped. In the private sector, he was lamenting our government&#8217;s lack of involvement in the business of acquiring oil resources, but in the political shadows, he was building a coalition to turn things around&#8230;<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In his 1999 speech at the London Petroleum Institute in London, Dick Cheney, C.E.O. of Halliburton, spoke to the assembled oil barons about the some of the problems in oil acquisition: Governments and the national oil companies are obviously controlling about ninety per cent of the assets. Oil remains fundamentally a government business. While many [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_bbp_topic_count":0,"_bbp_reply_count":0,"_bbp_total_topic_count":0,"_bbp_total_reply_count":0,"_bbp_voice_count":0,"_bbp_anonymous_reply_count":0,"_bbp_forum_subforum_count":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[2],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-826","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/826","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=826"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/826\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=826"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=826"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/1boringoldman.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=826"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}