will they wake up?

Posted on Thursday 19 October 2006


Little Initiative
by Amy Sullivan

Early Monday morning, a tell-all book from a former Bush White House official hit Washington like a small explosion, generating at least a color orange political threat level. Here was a conservative Republican, someone who had been on the inside of the president’s signature domestic policy agenda of the first term, leveling damaging accusations of hypocrisy, wide-scale manipulation, and deceit. Conservatives reacted accordingly. They charged the traitor, former Deputy Director of the Office of Faith-Based and Community Initiatives David Kuo, with timing the book to do maximum damage in the midterm elections, and they compared him to Judas Iscariot, the disciple who betrayed Jesus. "What David Kuo is saying about the President and his efforts," said David Contreras, Texas director of the Council on Faith in Action, "is nothing more than a cynical attempt to sell books and line his pockets with 30 pieces of silver [a reference to the payment Judas received for turning Jesus over to the Pharisees.]"

The reaction from the left has been, to put it mildly, slightly less vigorous. It is in stark contrast to the way in which liberal commentators and bloggers embraced other revelations, such as former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill’s memoir or the latest Bob Woodward book. This time, the responses have ranged from total silence to yawns to fears that the book could backfire on the Democratic Party. In general, most liberals have chosen to distance themselves from Kuo and his case.

This could just be smart politics. After all, Republicans are in such a free-fall at the moment that it might be best for liberals to stay out of the way and let conservatives fling recriminations at each other, as has largely been the case with the Mark Foley scandal. But something else is at play, too. Despite the evidence Kuo presents in Tempting Faith, liberals simply don’t believe him. They’ve spent so much time fear-mongering about American theocracy that a book illustrating the opposite simply makes no sense to them. In fact, the real revelation of Kuo’s book is not that the Bushies don’t care about evangelicals; it’s that liberals are too wedded to their views to capitalize on it.
Any Sullivan is certainly a known expert and her ideas deserve a good hearing, but her conclusion in this case falls a little flat with me. She proposes that people like me are so wedded to the idea that our government will become a Theocracy that we can’t accept Kuo’s revelation that Bush et al are just using the Religious Right to muster votes to stay in power.

I think the lukewarm response to the book isn’t as lukewarm as she thinks. In the first place, we know that Bush is just using the Religious Right. Who could imagine that these people are primarily motivated by religion? Even the loony version of religion the likes of Falwell, Robertson, and Dobson preach? The Bush team uses the Religious Right just like Machiavelli suggest through his modern interpreter, Michael Ledeen. We know that the Faith Based Initiative is and always has been baloney. It was an excuse to shut down government programs, and give them away to the Christian world. It gets votes, ‘buys voters,’ and excuses social irresponsibility.

I think the reason the response to the book looks muted is that we are in no position to preach to the Religious Right. They and their leaders devalue anything that comes out of our mouths. We’re delighted that David Kuo came clean about this corrupt program, validating what should be obvious to everyone. But he’s one of "theirs." If they’re not so deluded and can hear what he’s saying, great. But for the Democrats to jump on the bandwagon is fraught with danger. The Rovian spin would be immediate and fierce. So, my take on this book is that it’s for the Christians to evaluate and digest on their own They need to see what kind of government they put into power, and how they’ve been duped.

At the "Values Voters" extraveganza recently, James Dobson proposed:

Standing before an enormous American flag in Mellon Arena, conservative evangelical activist James Dobson told thousands of supporters he was deeply disappointed in the nation’s Republican leadership, but that the nation’s future depended on re-electing them.

However, he said, "This country is at a crisis point. Whether or not the Republicans deserve the power they were given, the alternatives are downright frightening."
But, he asked his audience to consider what would happen if Republicans lost control of key committees on education, the judiciary, and especially, the armed forces.
He compared those who want to negotiate their way out of crises in the Middle East to Neville Chamberlain, the British prime minister who sought to appease Adolph Hitler prior to World War II.
James Dobson, the only remaining real power in the Religious Right, is saying the same thing as Kuo. The Republicans aren’t what was wanted for the religious agenda, but you should vote for them anyway. Then he justifies this somewhat absurd notion with a very secular Karl Rove talking point that has nothing to do with religion or family.

It’s for the Christians to hear the absurdity in linking the Republicans to the Christian Religion. It’s for the Christians to hear the disdain and contempt coming their way from the White House so evident in Kuo’s book. It’s for the Christians to hear James Dobson isn’t talking Jesus or Family, he’s talking Republican fear-mongering foreign policy. If they can’t hear it when it’s this loud, they’re not Christians at all.

And that. Amy Sullivan, is our real greatest fear – that they don’t really care about morality or religion either. They’re just bigots and racists hiding their motives behind pseudo-pius Demogogues like James Dobson.

I hope that’s not true. But in any case, it’s not for liberal Democrats to tell them…

  1.  
    October 20, 2006 | 7:19 PM
     

    Hello Mickey,

    David Kuo’s book does nothing to dispel claims of an American theocracy as some have asserted. In fact, he has inadvertently provided stunning insights into their true nature and purpose. No leader of an empire ever truly believes the religions used to manipulate subjects. That would be like a drug dealer hooked on his product; its bad for business…

    Understanding why religion is strong delusion

    Christians often quote things like “know them by their fruits,” yet after millennia of being duped into abetting blatantly evil scoundrels, many still don’t understand the meaning or import of much of what they read. The same canon paradoxically propounds “faith,” which means the complete opposite of “know them by their fruits,” i.e., to discern the truth by analyzing deeds and results (works) and to weigh actions instead of merely believing what is said.

    The deceptive circular logic of posing a fantasy messiah who urges both discernment of the truth and faith (belief without proof) clearly represents a skillful and purposeful effort to impose ignorance and confusion through “strong delusion.” Any sage worth his salt could understand the folly of this contradictory so-called wisdom. This and mountains of evidence demonstrate that faith and religion are the opposite of truth and wisdom. It is no wonder charlatans like Rove, Bush, and others have marked Christians as dupes to be milked as long and as hard as possible. Any accomplished con artist easily recognizes religion as the ultimate scam and fervent followers as ready-made marks and dupes.

    We now live in an era where science has proven so much about the vastness, rationality, mathematical preciseness, and structural orderliness throughout every level of our 11-dimension universe. Nonetheless, large percentages of people still conclude that these flawed and contradictory religious canons are the unmodified and infallible “word of God.” People who can’t (or won’t) discern the difference between truth and belief are easily misled about the differences between good and evil, wisdom and folly, perfection and error, reason and irrationality, and right and wrong.

    The fact that political leaders have always had close relationships with religious leaders while cooperating to manipulate followers to gain wealth and power is overwhelming evidence that the true purpose of religion is deception and delusion. People who are unable to effectively discern basic moral choices or to reason accurately are easily indoctrinated to follow the dictates of national and imperial leaders who wrap themselves in religious pretense. Truth and wisdom are direct threats to the existence and power of empires. That is why imperial leaders always strive to hide so-called secret knowledge and impose deception and ignorance upon their subjects.

    What then is the purpose of “faith” but to prevent otherwise good people from seeking to understand truth and wisdom?

    Read More…

    Peace…

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.