it ain’t so…

Posted on Saturday 23 June 2007

The background details are surprisingly straightforward. In 1995, the Clinton White House issued an executive order establishing uniform rules for protecting classified information. In 2003, the Bush White House revised it. The order plainly includes any executive-branch agency, any military department, and "any other entity within the executive branch that comes into the possession of classified information." The entire branch of government, the order said, is subject to oversight.

This week, however, in light of revelations about the White House ignoring its own E.O., the Bush gang started spinning like a top.
The White House said Friday that, like Vice President Dick Cheney’s office, President Bush’s office is not allowing an independent federal watchdog to oversee its handling of classified national security information.

An executive order that Bush issued in March 2003 — amending an existing order — requires all government agencies that are part of the executive branch to submit to oversight. Although it doesn’t specifically say so, Bush’s order was not meant to apply to the vice president’s office or the president’s office, a White House spokesman said.
Look, I can appreciate the fact that the White House is in a jam here. Bush, Cheney, and the rest of the gang repeatedly mishandled classified materials during a time of war, got caught, ignored their own rules, and is now struggling to rationalize their conduct. When the federal agency responsible for oversight tried to do its job, the Vice President reportedly tried to abolish the agency. This isn’t a fact-pattern that’s easy to spin.
Ever find yourself wondering what these people are talking about? This whole thing is absurd. They are claiming they are above oversight. That they don’t have to keep records or make them available.
  • Independent of their rationalization du jour, it ain’t so.
  • It really doesn’t matter what excuse they use, it ain’t so.
  • If the Supreme Court backs them up, it still ain’t so.
  1.  
    smoooochie
    June 24, 2007 | 9:47 AM
     

    Immediately I’m thinking that Cheney didn’t learn much from the whole private company scandals that created Sarbanes-Oxley. Even private companies are subject to oversight. This is no different. They are subject. Period.

    Looks like I need to work on my weekly message to my congress people.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.